LHaus
Apr 22 2010

Trying to park in Long Island City? May the force be with you.

Parking in Long Island City

It’s no secret that trying to find parking in LIC, is a… challenge, to put it nicely. As a NY1 video recently picked up, there’s not enough parking for the local biz on Vernon, and because there’s no meters on side streets, people can park for as long as they want.

On the other hand, residents claim there’s not enough residential parking as it is, because out-of-town commuters languish in unregulated spaces for months. Alternate-side is apparently imminent and will swoop down upon us one day… though no one knows when. It seems that will overturn long-term commuter parking on the streets, but not solve the problem for local biz on Vernon who need their patrons to be able to park quickly.

Supposedly more parking spaces are on the way for LIC. We think. Ever checked out Bloomberg’s PlaNYC2030? Well, new ‘transit-oriented’ developments like our forthcoming Hunters Point South, for instance, might end up doing the exact opposite of creating a ‘greener and greater New York.’

Via Gotham Gazette:

“The unfortunate truth is that many of New York City’s ‘transit oriented’ rezonings instead encourage automobile use by requiring off-street parking. They destroy the mixed-use, walk-to-work character of communities like Long Island City in favor of high-end residential redevelopment. The increased number of spaces in rezoned neighborhoods like Long Island City, Harlem, and Greenpoint-Williamsburg – close to the Manhattan core and touted by the city as transit-oriented – will likely add tens of thousands of new cars to the city. The convenience provided by abundant and free off-street parking is a major incentive for people to use cars rather than transit.”

“As a case in point, the recent rezoning of Dutch Kills – specifically cited as a sustainable transit-oriented rezoning in 2009′s PlaNYC update – incorporates minimum parking requirements of half to two thirds of a parking space per apartment. To the west of Dutch Kills on the Long Island City waterfront, the Queens West and Hunters Point South mega-developments, also lauded in PlaNYC, will add more than 6,000 new parking spaces when completed.”

Ok, 6,000 new parking spaces, but how many more cars?

43 Comments

Leave Your Comment Comment Feed

Having consideration for people who live here is a foreign concept for the people who make the rules.
Residential parking is long overdue in the areas around subway stops, esp around Queensboro Plaza.

#1 xxxxxxxxx / 1 year, 9 months ago

who said the required parking will be free? I certainly didnt get free parking in my building…can’t wait till alternate side parking and other parking restrictions. Makes off street parking worth more and frees up more spaces for temp parking for visitors.

#2 pkyc0 / 1 year, 9 months ago

what LIC needs is a multi level municpal parking lot near the vernon/jackson & LIRR station.
1. Commuters, who are traveling from other areas and take the 7 to Manhattan, would have to pay for using space.
2. Residents would have a cheaper alternative than parking in the $200/month private parking lots.
3. Businesses would have higher volume because people would find parking easier.
4. City would make money from metered parking. (Usually $0.25 per 15mins. or $4 for 12hrs.)

#3 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

Years ago the DOT held a mtg @ PS78Q – They said then that resident permit parking WOULD NEVER be issued for LIC. They wouldn’t even give the staff of the school parking which is common around many schools in the city.

#4 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

Totally disagree with No. 3. The last thing we need is another one of those hideous municipal parking garages. There are already a number of them near the waterfront in the new buildings and from what I can tell none of them are filled to capacity. A new one isn’t going to change a thing. The problem is and always will be that 1) People will not pay for parking where it is possible to park for free or for very little and 2) LIC is being used as a transit hub for people from long island and other parts of the city. The solution is as follows:

More meters on Vernon and key commercial blocks allowing for short term parking for businesses. They should top out at 1 hour. You should be able to pull into any of the number of local business by easily finding parking out front.

Some limited form of alternate side of the street parking. As much as it is a nuisance it does it force people to use and move their cars, but the streets could use cleaning. People would not be able to park the “weekend” car on the block and leave it there for 5 out of 7 days untouched. They would be forced to move it or find a spot in any of the ample number of parking spots in the residential buildings.

Residential parking permits. the few spots that are here should go to the people that live and work here – not to some middle manager from LI who likes to drive to work in the city, but can’t be bothered to pay the toll and pay for parking in the city. Local policy should not be driven by the needs of outsiders. We should take care of our own first.

#5 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

The city really needs to conduct some kind of a parking survey in the area to find out exactly who is parking on local streets, where they orinate from, why they are visitng LIC and how long they park their cars. Without this info, all we have is anecdotal information and won’t know whether residential permts or any other remedy will work. Although I suspect that a large percentage of the parkers are suburbanites or Manhattan residents who use our streets as a long-term parking lot, how do we really know? It’s possible that the explosion in population in LIC and households with cars alone is to blame.

#6 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

Here’s a crazy idea. Maybe a neighborhood only about 5 square miles with more than a dozen subway stations, 2 regional rail stations, and countless buses doesn’t need more parking? Ok, let’s think for a second what the uses of additional parking in LIC (assuming every parking space there is currently “used”).

1.) For people not living in LIC to drive there. These people might then take the subway to Manhattan, or they might be driving to LIC to buy stuff. Either way, LIC is easy to get to without a car, and both these uses will add immense traffic. They are ultimately far worse for the neighborhood than far better. People from Manhattan aren’t driving to LIC, they don’t have cars.

2.) For people who live in LIC to keep a car. What are you doing with this car? You’re not driving to work in Manhattan, that’s for sure. Maybe you’re driving to a job on LI somewhere. That’s not helping the city at all. Have a job in the city. Maybe you’re a vagrant living at the powerplant (the furthest point in the entire neighborhood from a subway station, at about 4500 feet), and you want to be able to drive to the subway yourself. Maybe you want to be able to drive yourself to one of the Targets in Queens to go shopping for cheap groceries. That’s not helping the local businesses in LIC at all either. These additional cars also create traffic and promote additional discretionary automobile trips.

3.) You’d like a garage to get all the parked cars off the streets and put bike lanes everywhere. I like this idea a bunch, but something tells me it wouldn’t play out like that.

LIC definitely needs Municipal Meter style parking so that there IS short term parking available near businesses. That said, studies have shown MOST of the parking near businesses in the city are taken up by the employees that work there. I also doubt that much, if any of the traffic for most of the businesses on Vernon come from cars in the first place. There’s no need for additional parking at all. Raising the cost of the parking that’s there would solve the problem, especially since many of the cars surely come from further out on LIC. Here’s a little data driven evidence (care of the ACS):

LIC is mainly PUMA 04001 (and somewhat 04109). For the purpose of these numbers, though, I didn’t bother to combine the two. SORRY! Work on it yourself.

Anyway, there are about 52,000 occupied housing units. Of these, only 31% own a car (26% own a single care per household, the other 6% have 2 or more). That means there’s only about 16,000 cars in LIC. As a car is about 6ft wide and 14 feet long, that’s about .05 sq miles or 1% of the land are of LIC. This is easily absorbed on street ignoring the 2,000+ spaces in Queens West alone. Additionally, only 17% of the 68,000 people living in LIC who are employed commute to work by car. That’s less than half of the people who even own a car.

Parking is NOT an issue.

If you’d like to do some more fun ACS research on your own, may I recommend:

http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ADPTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=79500US3604001&-qr_name=ACS_2008_3YR_G00_DP3YR2&-context=adp&-ds_name=&-tree_id=3308&-_lang=en&-redoLog=false&-format=
http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ADPTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=79500US3604109&-qr_name=ACS_2008_3YR_G00_DP3YR2&-context=adp&-ds_name=&-tree_id=3308&-_lang=en&-redoLog=false&-format=

#7 Matt / 1 year, 9 months ago

also, commerical plates (like the fruit guy) park all day in the same spot. PS cant they paint the graffitti off their truck???

#8 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

Oh boy, I’m gonna get flamed here, I know, but I may as well throw in a comment from one the Queens West high-rise dwellers…

We have a “weekend car” which we park on the street and leave for days at a time. We considered renting a spot in the garage when we first moved in, but decided to see how difficult it was to park on the street. I have never had a problem finding a space. In two years, I have received 2 tickets. One was for parking within 15 feet of a hydrant (a rule that is “flexibly” enforced in the neighborhood) and most recently when the stretch of 5th was changed to accomodate the police parking their private vehicles there (my wife didn’t notice the sign change).

The garages in the East Coast II, and Avalon North and South are less than half full. They all offer good deals for commuters (I think all are under $10/day), and most are around $200/mo. for residents. If alternate side was instituted, I’d probably suck it up and rent a spot.

I’m confused on the need for “shoppers” to park on Vernon Blvd. Aren’t those businesses oriented toward the walking-distance community? Who is driving to LIC to shop at a wine store on Vernon (the owner was spotlighted in the NY1 piece and indicated that the lack of parking on Vernon was a real problem for him)? If you come to LIC to eat at Manducatti’s, the 7 is right there as well.

For that matter, who are these people that are supposedly driving in from far away, parking their cars in the neighborhood from Monday-Friday, then driving back out at the end of the week? Is this really what’s happening? It would seem the garages have plenty of room for them, if they really exist.

Maybe permit parking is the way to go, I really don’t know. Is it possible that there isn’t really a problem here that needs solving?

#9 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

LIC’s future is to become Queens’ answer to Hoboken. Sorry but that’s the truth. No parking for anyone, no matter how much they build or how many meters, or what types, they put in.

We need more ferry service and a footpath over the East River.

#10 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

some of you really like to hear yourselves type…make your points more briefly, pls. – you bore us…

#11 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

of course these rezoned areas need off street parking. in a new neighborhood without all the necessary services, i need my car to get all the things i need. before food cellar openned, without a car, you would need to lug all your groceries on the bus or subway. ridiculous.

and the argument that peeps having cars means not patronizing local establishments is wrong. the local businesses just need to be more competitive with prices, service and/or selection. dont blame car owners for the lack of business.

i agree that lic shouldnt be the parking lot for outsiders, but dont attach lic peeps with cars.

#12 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

“and the argument that peeps having cars means not patronizing local establishments is wrong. the local businesses just need to be more competitive with prices, service and/or selection. dont blame car owners for the lack of business.”

But when transportation costs are subsidized (in this case the cost of you driving to buy your things), they cannot compete on price. They have rent to pay, it’s more expensive in a nicer place. They cannot compete with some super tax break enhanced target out on Long Island on price, and the fact of the matter is, they definitely can’t compete when it’s cheaper for you to drive out there than when it is to just walk into their store.

As to the guy who’s bored, you’re probably the same sort of fellow who drives 3 blocks to the subway and expects there to be another spot right there.

Finally, plenty of people carry their groceries on the subway. It’s not that big of a deal. That’s the joy of being in the city. How many groceries do you need to buy at one time, anyway?

#13 Matt / 1 year, 9 months ago

matt…how is my transportation subsidized? i dont park on the street, i paid for my parking spot fair and square. its also a blanket assumption that people drive to target (or anywhere else) just to get something cheaper, not really the case more often than not.

and tell the mother of 2, who does all the shopping, to lug everything home via subway.

#14 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

residents in LIC really do want EVERYTHING!

#15 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

#7, interesting points and data. Thanks for taking the tiem to post.

#16 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

Yup, thanks #7. Interesting info.

#17 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

This is really simple:

We don’t need more parking.

The large garages at Avalon and Rockrose are never full. Park there.

We need more meters, which will solve the problem of commuters leaving their cars for days.

#18 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

I challenge the notion set forth by #7 that there are 2000 parking spaces in QW and that 16,000 cars are easily absorbed by street parking. Not true at all. If there are 16,000 resident cars, then add to that at least 5,000 commuter cars (more, not-including the long-term freeloaders), 5,000-10,000 visiting cars, and then trucks and commercial vehicles (probably at least 1,000 if not more considering all the industry)… then on top of that, a huge chunk of the parking goes to commercial around here, and police, fire etc… There is not enough parking in LIC, and your data actually proves it. You just glossed over the number of ACTUAL parking spaces available. Makes me wonder what is your agenda.

——–
“Anyway, there are about 52,000 occupied housing units. Of these, only 31% own a car (26% own a single care per household, the other 6% have 2 or more). That means there’s only about 16,000 cars in LIC. As a car is about 6ft wide and 14 feet long, that’s about .05 sq miles or 1% of the land are of LIC. This is easily absorbed on street ignoring the 2,000+ spaces in Queens West alone.”

#19 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

The vehicles with out of town plates, the insurance rate stealers, should be towed. Walking up 48th everyday I count at least 5 and that’s only on one side of the street. Also there are plenty of NY plates parked in LIC – that are registered to other suburban addresses in NY. I’m SURE most of the people live in LIC and have registered their cars at there weekend place in the Hamptons or at their parents homes.

#20 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

I agree local businesses need to realize some of their prices are high. I think the only bar that still gives a buy back is the bar by the 7 train.

#21 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

There are def. so many cars with out of state plates. Florida in particular.

#22 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

Rockrose’ parking lot is pretty full but only at night (all levels). Not sure about Avalon. Regardless, the BMW, Audi, Mercedes, Lexus drivers are not parking in there. I’m sure if it were cheaper, more people would rent a space instead of leaving their car in the street.

There is clearly not enough parking for everyone, residents or visitors. Just look at the number of cars that circle on weeknights and weekends.

#23 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

#22, those are just the cheap people. If you can afford the cost of a car, gas, insurance and maintenance, you can afford to pay for a parking spot.

And yeah, WTF is up with buybacks in LIC! McReilly’s gave them, as did Lucky Mojos. RIP.

#24 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

Some serious drinking must happen in LIC if people are complaining about not getting buybacks. Jeesh.

#25 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

It’s plausible that more than half of the cars parked at least on the waterfront are not from LIC. Either it’s out of state, or NY plates probably registered somewhere else like long island or further out in queens. Whoever thinks that parking is not a problem in LIC is delusional. Just imagine when the economy gets better and they start building condos again. We need alternate side asap. I’m not excited to move my car, but it will clear up hundreds of parking spots I’m sure. And more meters for Vernon are definitely needed. It’s insane how few there are. But they should do all that at THE SAME TIME. If they are taking away spots for meters, at least give us the ones back claimed by those idiots with Jersey plates (sorry but they are) who leave their car in the same spot for months. I’m not exaggerating.

#26 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

A NYC block is typically 1/20 mile by 1/10 mile or 264 ft by 528 ft. If the average length of a car is 14 ft each city block can park 113 cars. If there are 16,000 cars in LIC you would need 142 city blocks to park them all. If you define LIC as the area bordered by the QB Bridge, Newton creek, the LIRR rail yard and the East river there must be at least 100 unique blocks. Granted these block are of varying sizes, but also LIC is a much larger area and the 16,000 cars were derived using area well beyond that small boarder. Its seems entirely plausible that if parking were restricted to only LIC that there would be plenty of street parking for all. Now in truth if you live in Queens West you are not going to park by the bridge, but as a statistical and intellectual excise it appears to have merit.

#27 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

#26, less than half of that space you are talking about is zoned for all parking. Most of LIC, especially away from the waterfront is commercial parking only. And Trying to park in court square is not the same as trying to park at vernon jackson. Vernon is absolutely impossible, you don’t need any data to know there are way more cars than parking spaces. The parking garages are expensive. It’s ok on occasion, when it’s really bad, but usually it’s still worth fighting for a spot on the street. But it is indeed a fight. Unless you can physically count the cars and spaces, everyone is just making up numbers. There is no merit to your data, just your own speculation, which seems way way off base after living here for years with a car.

#28 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

27, Fine, don’t believe it but having a guaranteed parking spot is not a constitutional right. Put in the garage. If you can’t afford to put it in the garage then get rid of the car and get on the subway it or keep driving around in circles looking for a spot. There is sufficient on street and off street parking for LIC. I don’t know what it s that you are proposing.

#29 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

28, you clearly don’t know the parking situation in Hunters Point. If we had more meters on the main commercial streets to keep out people who park their cars for weeks on end in the neighborhood, it would free up more spaces for those people visiting area restaurants and control the amount of traffic that is forced to circle the area looking for a space. I really think the solution is as easy as that.

#30 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

If there were decent retail in LIC I would get rid of the car altogether. But there’s not. If you are putting a home together, you can’t even get base essentials in LIC. Unless you DRIVE to Home Depot or other places in faraway parts of LIC. A car is not necessarily preposterous in LIC… you’re just a car hater. There is no where near sufficient parking in LIC, and when they build more condos it will become even worse because the condo garages are always expensive. Anyway, I’m wasting my breath. You obviously don’t have a car here, which is fine, just don’t act like you know what you are talking about. Because you clearly don’t have a clue. Ask any business owner on Vernon if they think there is enough parking.

#31 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

I don’t think that Hunters Point residents, including the condo owners, make up a large proportion of those parking in the neighborhood. And LIC car owners are probably not frequent drivers either. A large majority likely take the subway to work and only use their car sparingly on weekends for trips out of town or to go shopping for groceries and other essentials.

The parking space hoggers are cops, long-term parkers from far afield, commercial drivers and suburban commuters.

#32 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

Sorry, when I said there is sufficient parking I menat that with the addition of common sense rules like short term metered parking in commercial areas alternate side of the street and the introduction of residential parking permits, there should be enough. Sorry for the confusion.

I do have an issue with the notion that Everyone should be able to have 1 (2+) cars and have ample free on street parking. That’s never going to happen. This is NYC. Most stores will deliver to you because they know that you can’t haul large items on the subway. I’ve lived in LIc for 15+ years without a car. It is possible with planning. Government should not everything so car focused. We should be looking for ways to encourage people to leave their cars at home.

#33 #28 / 1 year, 9 months ago

Wow, this conversation has gotten incredible! Thanks guys! Ok, so look, while I understand where everyone is coming from about “decent retail in LIC” (absolutely correct, no Home Depot), I find that an odd argument. There’s only 2 Home Depots in Manhattan, and both of them are farther from most residents than the Home Depot on Northern Blvd is from LIC. Somehow we get by. I agree with the person above, really, that delivery is the way to go. You could then make the argument, I suppose, that delivery is expensive, you can’t afford it! Well, an interesting argument, but I actually suspect your car is really expensive too, and if you got rid of it, you’d be able to afford delivery. In fact, and this is a funny thing about economics, if parking in LIC cost more, delivery would suddenly be relatively cheaper. Some people might even ditch the car and switch to delivery. Then all the people who can afford to park and still want to can. Almost everyone wants a car in the same way as almost everyone wants the subway to stop at their front door and drop them off inside their office building as well, but we can’t always get what we want. The trick is to set these things up accurately.

To the person who feels my parking calculation is completely off, I’m not sure what to tell you. The city doesn’t actually track parking spots in neighborhoods (they did just start doing it for the first time in Hudson yards!), and the ACS is a household survey, not a geographical one, so the number isn’t there. The 2000 spots in Queens West comes from the queenswest.com site. Based on the 3 gigantic garages over there, though, you’re talking less than 700 spots a garage. Based on the fact that 2 garages are 4 stories, and one is, I believe, 7, you’re talking about 120 spaces a floor. This does not seem unreasonable in the slightest.

Finally, I’m not saying that cars in LIC are ridiculous, what I am saying is that if there is more demand for parking than there is actual parking, economically, there are two solutions:

1.) Build more parking
2.) Make the parking that exists more expensive

What I’m arguing is that the first option is extremely detrimental to the city, because it will promote the continued unnecessary use of automobiles. Transportation if plentiful, delivery is available, and truthfully, many of the most interesting things in LIC can just be walked to. One of the problems with adding more infrastructure for cars, but keeping the same price is that it actually lowers the price, relatively, of having a car. This actually changes the demand curve and that means that creating more parking has a feedback loop that positively influences automotive trips. We don’t have that luxury, or maybe shouldn’t, in the city. The only solution, then, to controlling demand is to make parking more expensive. This doesn’t have to be done evenly. I strongly support relatively low cost residential permits coupled with additional metered spaces to prohibit car commuting to LIC (no matter what the end destination is). When I lived on RI, I know many people parked their car in LIC because it was free vs. the two garages on RI. This is a car subsidy (certainly with the caveat that there’s a time cost involved to the individual). It has to stop. If you can afford the car, but not the parking, you can’t really afford the car, and quite honestly, you probably don’t need it in the first place. If you DID need it, you would be able to afford it.

#34 Matt / 1 year, 9 months ago

queenswest.com is not a site from which to draw any official data about LIC. It’s just a person’s message board. Not a statistics company. And Matt, of course people in Manhattan don’t need Home Depot because there is a hardware/houseware store in every neighborhood. It’s ridiculous to even compare. You have no argument. LIC doesn’t have 1/10th the base amenities of almost every other urban nyc neighborhood. Of course you can live without a car, but you can live with one too, and I am all for bike lanes, all for police and fire parking, but I’m all for residents having some rights to the curb as well. And the businesses. Sorry but none of your fake data changes anything. LIC is not the West Village, we have Home Depot or nothing else. Put a hardware store on Vernon Blvd and then I will shut up about that. But until one is there, I won’t. And we don’t have sufficient parking. Any reasonable person who has lived here for 5 minutes can testify to that. (Note the use of the word reasonable.)

#35 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

2/3rds of the people who live in LIC don’t own a car. I’m not sure they’ve really been touched by the lack of parking. While my information about the garages is just a series of reasonable estimates, if you don’t believe the American Community Survey, the country’s gold standard for regional information, then there’s really nothing I can do to sway your view about parking and LIC. The idea of being able to ride the subway just a few stops to a hardware store and then having whatever you buy delivered seems to be the exclusive purvey of Manhattanites then. I suppose they’re all suckers for not owning cars. Life would be just so much easier.

#36 Matt / 1 year, 9 months ago

Who are these people that are constantly going to hardware stores? I’ve been to Home depot maybe twice in the last year. Each time by subway I would add. Your entire justification for a car rests on two hours of shopping in a year?

#37 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

Citylights has 527 parking spaces, Avalon has 594, Rockrose has 825. The 2,000 figure for Queens West is pretty much spot on.

http://www.nyc.gov/html/oec/downloads/pdf/08DME006Q/08DME0006Q_Final_Scope.pdf

The EIS report on Hunters Point largely confirms the anecdotal conclusions reached above. Plenty of parking in the evenings and weekends after the commuters leave the area. Operating at capacity during the workday. Excluding the communting cars the parking garages in LIC barely get to 30-40% occupancy. The parking problems in LIC do not come from within.

Source – NYC EDC
http://www.nycedc.com/ProjectsOpportunities/CurrentProjects/Queens/HuntersPointSouth/Documents/HPS2_16%20Traffic%20and%20Parking.pdf

#38 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

those pdfs are old and clearly do not reflect the current parking situation. Correct me if I am mistaken but, I don’t think you can even park in Avalon unless you live there?

anyone saying that there is plenty of parking space most likely does not operate a vehicle in LIC.

#39 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

#39, it sounds like you are not inclinded to believe anything except your narrow views, even when you are shown to be wrong, so good luck to you. The EIS for hunters point was only just published a few months ago.

#40 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

#40 and #38 (Same person?) you don’t seem inclined to any other view point either. (I’m not 39). I don’t understand how you can say there is no parking problem in LIC, and then say the parking problem in LIC is not from within. The latter is a correct statement. There is a parking problem in LIC and it’s not caused by the residents. It’s caused by everyone else who uses LIC as a parking lot, for various reasons. The residents and businesses have the least right to the curb and that is what we would like to improve by putting in more meters and alternate side parking. Your data is useless and irrelevant, and also totally out of date.

#41 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

I am #38 and 40. There is a parking problem – I never said there wasn’t. I’m just taking issue with the solution being proposed by some which seems to be throwing up a bunch of municipal parking lots. This problem requires a thoughtful approach. Since most people in LIC do not have cars or they put them into any of the number of garages in the new buildings. There is enough parking for people from LIC if common sense rules are instituted.

#42 Anonymous / 1 year, 9 months ago

The “municipal” parking lots were all built for residents of the buildings, but no one uses them now. This was the deal that Queens West made with the neighborhood 12 years ago. This was to stop the fears of the original community here that is sadly fed up with this problem because of overdevelopment and the unsustainable amount of people that have moved into such a small geographic area, most with cars. A simple solution that turned into a nightmare due to poor planning and a pack of lies to the original residents of this area.

Now everyone is belly aching about lack of parking. Makes no sense. You live in a particular building, use and pay for your garage. that was the original agreement.

End of parking problem.

#43 Anonymous / 1 year, 3 months ago

Leave Your Comment

Some HTML Allowed

Your e-mail will not be shown. Although if you have a Gravatar it will be shown here. Otherwise, anonymous comments are welcome.