LHaus
Aug 5 2009

Democratic City Council Candidates challenged by Deirdre Feerick

District 26 City Council candidates at liQcity panel on July 21st, LIC

From the Queens Gazette:

“The Democratic primary race for the 26th District City Council seat had until lately been marked by civility among its five candidates, as reflected in the debates they held this spring in Sunnyside and Dutch Kills. That civility was disrupted when one of them, Deirdre Feerick, challenged the petitions submitted by two others, Kwame Smalls and David Rosasco. Not challenged were the remaining candidates, Jimmy Van Bramer and Brent O’Leary; but they took up the cause of Smalls and Rosasco. The four of them assembled Monday for an outdoor press conference on a terrace of the Ravenswood Houses in Long Island City.

Van Bramer acknowledged his unchallenged status but deplored what he saw as Feerick’s attempt to advance her chances in the September 15 primary vote by eliminating the chances of two competitors.

Smalls’ campaign manager, George Weissberger, said the challenge to Smalls was a challenge to diversity, since Smalls is African-American and disabled also, being afflicted with retinitis pigmentosa, a degenerative eye condition. Smalls himself called Feerick “a hypocrite” for expressing democratic sentiments while trying to crush two rival candidacies.

Rosasco thanked Van Bramer and O’Leary for standing by him, then reasserted his legitimacy by saying he had the names of more than 900 registered Democrats on his petitions. He was confident they would vote for him and added that the matter should be settled “in the ballot box, not in the courts”.

O’Leary agreed. Alluding to Feerick’s alleged legal assistance in the petition challenge, he said that victory should depend on the ballot box “and not the trickiest lawyer”.”

A spokesperson for Deirdre Feerick responded: “You’re entering into a legal process when you gather signature, [...] If they’re being challenged, there’s something wrong with their petitions.”

9 Comments

Leave Your Comment Comment Feed

In the article it says Kwame is going to throw his support towards Deirdre Feerick? The same person who got him kicked off the ballot? I don’t understand his thinking…

#1 Anonymous / 2 years, 6 months ago

I agree this is undemocratic. The only reason to fight to take names off the ballot is if you fear losing vote. Feerick just dropped another notch in my book. She is part of the Queens political machine. In other news I’m loving all the attention LIC is getting. Every weekday the candidates are by the train stations for the morning rush. Many days there are more than one.

#2 Anonymous / 2 years, 6 months ago

I would have voted for Smalls, but it’s clearly amateur hour when you don’t check your own signatures against the registered voter roll to make sure you have a legit 900.

Lesson learned. I just hope there’s another hilarious youtube vid about this.

#3 Anonymous / 2 years, 6 months ago

I don’t see why she would even waste her time. Smalls was only going to get the Ravenswood Houses and that’s it. Hardly a threat to her. Van Bramer and O’Leary are her real political threats.

#4 Anonymous / 2 years, 6 months ago

Actually I think it’s probably more the “machine”‘s doing than hers.

#5 Anonymous / 2 years, 6 months ago

Anyone know which restaurant the photo with this article was taken in?

#6 Anonymous / 2 years, 6 months ago

manducatis rustica on vernon blvd, #6.

#7 anonymous / 2 years, 6 months ago

I met Van Bramer on the street. He said his number one priortiy was affordable housing. What that does for me Im not sure.

#8 Anonymous / 2 years, 6 months ago

Looks like Feerick and her party backers succeeded in kicking Rosasco off the ballot.

#9 Anonymous / 2 years, 5 months ago

Leave Your Comment

Some HTML Allowed

Your e-mail will not be shown. Although if you have a Gravatar it will be shown here. Otherwise, anonymous comments are welcome.