If you smell something, say something.
Queens West remediation, Hunters Point, LIC
There seems to be some continuing issues with the toxic remediation of the remaining portion of the Queens West site at the Hunters Point waterfront. There’s been a growing number of complaints about petroleum-like odors emanating from the site and causing illness in the neighborhood. This week on Vernon Blvd, the fire department responded to suspected gas leak. None were found, and it was concluded that the callers had mistaken fumes from the nearby development sites (OCA as well) for the gas leak.
Joe Conley of CB2 and Paul Januszewski of Queens West Development Corp are requesting LIC residents to confirm the presence of odors/fumes emanating from the site, and/or any suspected related illnesses.
“We need email letters confirming that over the past several weeks (couple of months) you, the residents of LIC (especially near the waterfront), have experienced petroleum based odorous fumes in the neighborhood. But because a small handful of people have taken the time to complain, TRC, the private remediation company, has suggested we are “overly sensitive”. Your confirmation of what you may have experienced is important ASAP because the next phase of work needs the highest level of care. NYSDEC has declared it to be “a significant threat to human health and the environment”.
The petrol smell is pretty bad at times, the frequency of it occurring varies. Has anyone ever noticed the same smell in the area water supply? For some reason, now and then the water takes on a subtle but noticeable gas scent.
I feel I have noticed it in the water supply on rare occasion. It definitely is in the sewer system at times.
Last weekend it was all over the neighborhood. A couple of days ago it smelled like a gasoline truck spilled its delivery.
I work down the block from this site. The smell has been horrible for the last 2-3 weeks. I had headaches most of the earlier part of this week, and have felt nautious by quitting time. I have worked here full time for 5 years and nothing in the area has ever had this effect on me. I don’t know what exactly the odors are, but they have a definite physical effect. I have often considered making a complaint but I never knew who to speak to…. or if it would even matter. If either Joe or Paul wish to contact me directly they can feel free. My email address is my first name @ my last name dot com.
I have been getting migraines ever since the remediation began. Sore throat as well.
Not good.
Hey kc, when you say “gas”, are you referring to gasoline, or to natural gas (methane)? If it smeels like sulfur, then it might be a natural gas leak, from a small rupture in an underground pipe perhaps. Sulfur is added to methane, so we can tell when there is a gas leak, as methane is odorless and tasteless. Mixed in with the odor of whatever other compounds are being released, might explain the noxious effects. The sewer system is infamous for it’s release of foul smelling sulfurous compunds (sewer gas). If gasoline was spilled, it would smell very intense but disappear fairly rapidly, as volatile as the stuff is.
Hey everyone, complain away. Depending on what caused/is continuing to cause the noxious smells; it could be dealt with in a more timely manner. The NYS Dep’t of Enviornmental Protection is in the beige office building on 21st Street (or at least they used to be), up the hill from Jackson Avenue headed towards Hunters Point Avenue. Many people showing up at an office which almost never receives the public, might have a very positive and hopefully immediate effect (as far as action being taken goes). I haven’t been in that building in many years, since I last applied for a fishing license there.
Charlie
the entire neighborhood has stunk like gasoline the last week or so. you can smell it as soon as you get off the vernon jackson stop and it worsens as you head toward the remediation sites. not a sulfur smell, its a definite gas / oil smell.
thanks for posting this and hopefully it will be taken care of soon. i’ve given up on calling 311 after calling several times to report after-hours construction and demoliton. never got a response.
I hope I’m of some assistance with the suggestion. I hope it works. Also 311 just routes and passes information on to the appropriate dept./agency. I think that’s mainly what they do, from what I was once told by them. Try calling both the NYS Dept. of Enviornmental Protection and The New York City’s Enviornmental Protection Agency (I think it goes by that name). Call them directly.
If people are getting sick from the smell, then it might also fall under the jurisdiction of the Dept. of Health. Being that these compounds are/could be volatile, maybe the NYC Fire Department might get involved, especially if there’s a chance that a forgotten, and not yet identified underground storage tank of something potentially dangerous, might be leaking, due to corrosion and from jostling by the remediation.
Until proper identification and handling of the source(s) of the noxious fumes are acheived, then all possibilities, even remote ones, should be considered. Call, write to and/or visit the offices of these agencies.
Charlie.
I somehow missed the portion of this article which was in quotations and italics. Now that I’ve read it, in addition to what I’ve said, be sure to contact CB2 and QWDC with your concerns, observations and experiences.
Charlie.
People have been complaining off and on about odors from the remediation site for years now, so what good has this done? It seems obvious to me that stronger action, like threatening the DEC or the hired engineer with legal action, is the next recourse. It’s their legal responsibility to address the impacts of the work they have been tasked to do. If they can’t or won’t do it, then they need to be forced to do so.
I’ve lived here since the end of last year, and I have yet to smell any odors in the area. I am outside every single day, but I haven’t noticed anything out of the ordinary. Where are you people smelling this odor??
I definitely smell it when I walk by. Smells funkish.
Tara I was wondering the same thing. Not to try to minimize this – its definately concerning, but is it possible that some people do not have a sensitive nose enought to pick this up? It smells that same here as it always did.
@ tara & Anon:
I, too, hadn’t smelt the odor since the complaints began. However, recently I got a really good whiff of what this is all about – and it was BAD.
As all of us living here know, the wind tends to be quite strong, which I think is a major factor in this case. It wasn’t until I was taking a walk just NORTH of the site that I really smelt what people are complaining about – and believe me, you do NOT need to have a sensitive nose to smell it.
It’s more like really strong industrial glue than gas – although it’s similar to either I guess – and it makes you want to cover your face with your shirt. I was with three other people who all smelt it too.
It’s not always there – I guess it depends what they’re doing in that tent on any given day. But try walking around by the tents and by the softball/track field and, if it’s there that day, you’ll definitely smell it.
I’ve also been having very unusual migraines over the last week – but I really hope they’re not in any way related!
It’s also the beginning of ragweed season, which could be a cause of migraines, though I don’t know how much ragweed there is in LIC.
The primary area where it can be experienced is between 47thand 46th avenues and 5th and 11th streets.
Shh… you are totally ruining my property values. Everything is fine. I’m tryin’ to sell condos here!
Oh shut up 17. We are all residents and homeowners here. I’m glad this stuff is getting cleaned up. No one is interested in sweeping this under the rug. I just wish the gets done as quickly as possible and get a building on top of it to cap it. Let just remember this when so-called community groups advocate for less extensive remediation on our behalf. If you think the same stuff isn’t under the CUNY site I’ve got a bridge to sell you.
Shh… you are totally ruining my property values. Everything is fine. I’m tryin’ to sell condos here!
Have fun breathing that in.Greenpoint and LIC have the biggest rates of brain and kidney cancer from the Newtown creek and chemical plants as well as exposed sewer gas.
Has anyone called Jennifer Manley, Queens Director of the Mayor’s Community Affairs Unit? As an LIC resident, I am sure she’ll be very concerned.
#18 is hijacking a serious problem to push a well worn agenda. Fact is that all the other developers who have capped and built on slab have had full approval of all government cleanup programs without exposing the neighborhood to toxic fumes.
The present remediation has had two concurrent stories – they tell the taxpayers that they must clean up the terrible scary toxic soil and in the same gaseous breath tell us not to worry about what we are breathing – it’s safe.
18, I’m guessing you are the same person who keeps pushing an anti-community agenda here under the guise of concern for the environment. In reality your real concern is to push the idea that we must build-build-build-build-build. Your statements are always sly innuendo, attack on the community’s motives, and rarely based in fact. Sounds remarkably like the developer’s attorney.
#20, can you provide us with the source for what you state, or post a link? I’d like to read up on that info. I knew a lifetime Hunters Point resident who died from brain cancer.
Charlie.
around the water…yes. Gas, headaches, toxic dust.
But, on a related note, can anyone tel me why the court square area smells like delicious butter cookies?
Just a small correction – it’s NOT sulfer they add to natural gas, but one of the Mercaptins (ethyl or methyl), although I will admit they sometimes use a sulfide
You are correct kg2u (#25). It is not sulfur per se, which is added to the gases methane, propane, butane, etc. It is sulfur containing compounds they use, such as ethanethiol; which happens to be considered one of the “stinkiest” of compounds. These compounds can be detected by the human olfactory system in extremely small amounts, so very little needs to be used to be effective, as they all are toxic in large enough doses. Because so little is used, even huge gas leaks pose no problem with toxicity. Methane (CH4, which is the most simple and lightest of organic compounds) by itself is completely odorless and non-toxic, but will easily displace oxygen and cause asphyxiation. This is the main reason why these compounds are added to natural gas, in addition to it’s explosive nature. Quick detection is paramount to human, animal, and property safety.
I figured I’d just say sulfur, and forego any explanations, like the one here. Most people wouldn’t care, and really don’t need to, as the system works flawlessly.
Well, thanks for keeping me on my toes anyway.
Charlie.
The gasoline-like smell was not the rotten egg smell I associate with sulfur. It was more that penetrating petrol smell you get at the gas pump. The other fumes that are very common is a sort of earthy smell combined with the petroleum. I understand that the remediation also adds a leafy smell to help mask it. So it is sort of a mix of gasoline, swamp soil, and chloroseptic.
What we don’t smell are fumes such as benzene which were verified to have spread through the neighborhood the previous stage of remediation. I’m not sure if that is the case now but in general I’m told that the fact that you can smell something means that something is entering your system.
I work right in the area and I’ve never found the smell to be any more than a slight annoyance. As someone else noted, I’d be more concerned about toxic things in the air that cannot be smelled. But DEC has been working closely monitoring this and I’ve got to imagine they are doing their jobs. Aren”t they?
I would hope they are.
Charlie.
I work in the area and get a whiff of oily smell from time to time, but nothing that bothers me physically. They are removing a tremendous amount of contaminated soil from the site and I don’t think the job can be done without some odors escaping. I think that it is in the interest of the community to get the site cleaned up ASAP without creating impossible burdens to doing this work.
#24, the area near Court Square smells so delicious due to International Delights and other bakeries nearby. No headaches, just tummy grumbles.
#27 is right. It’s not a sulfur smell, it’s gas. When you get closer to the sites, it smells like gas/oil. Old stale yucky oil smell. like you’re at a refinery. I am wondering now about the stuff we can’t smell.
30, who is creating “impossible burdens” to enabling the site cleanup? If anything, everyone in the neighborhood has given the DEC and the site cleanup crew support to do the job right and with all appropriate haste. Raising concerns about the stink on the site and if they are doing the job as well as they could certainly does not qualify as a “burden.”
Don’t also overlook the contribution of Newtown Creek to the miasma of stench in LIC. There is more oil oozing into the creek than the equivalent of 3 Exxon Valdezes, and the sewage treatment plant adds a veritable cocktail of funk into the mix.
Sorry for the short notice. NY1 will be at the site (47th ave & 5th st) at 11:30 and would like to interview anyone who wants to weigh in.
Why do I have visions of new condo owners and developers wishing this thread would just go away?
Of course they don’t want this talked about. But in the end it’s not really going to hurt anyone anyway, because talking about it keeps people safe, and I’m assuming the safety of people is worth a few $/sf.
I’m closing on a new condo next month. Keep talking about it. The sqeaking wheel get the oil. I want it resolved as quickly as possible. #30 is right. Let them finish whatever they are doing as quickly as possible.
There is an industrial bakery near the court square area if I am not mistaken.
why would the condo developers hide this? It’s not their fault the toxicity is there. It’s a known fact stated in their prospectus that the site is a Brownfield and undergoing remediation. QW bungled the remediation on the first few sites, the absolute first being the most atrocious…basically they had no idea what they were doing. One could only hope they’ve figured it out by their fourth building… and it remains to be determined if they have or not. I don’t see any way to avoid smelling 100+ year old polluted oil being excavated from the ground. Though they are supposed to be buffering the smell. I walked down there today and smelled some fumes… mostly from the dorm site though. but it’s hard t0 tell.
#37 trust me, our safety is not the developer’s concern.
Just curious, but does anyone know of case studies of other similarly contaminated sites that were remediated and redeveloped with residential uses? Is this something that has been done regularly and successfully in the past or is this basically just a new concept with unproven results?
Contaminated sites are remediated and redeveloped for residential use all the time. It can be done safely if done properly and happens quite frequently. this is not a new concept.
43, It’s not exactly true that we know that this type of excavation can be done safely. For example, the monitoring has been ineffective. If you look at the logs online for the past months, there is barely a mention of any odors by the low wage monitors. Maybe one or two mentions per hundred hours even on the worst days. The State Department of Health has no data whatsoever on the effects because no study has been done. And incredible as it seems the NYS DEC doesn’t even have authority to step in as it is a so-called voluntary clean up.
I’m all for a fast clean up but one gets the sense that the present health of the community is possibly at risk in the name of future profitability from development.
I agree with 44. The whole concept of making a heavily polluted industrial site livable strikes me as dubious. Sure, you can clean up the soil at a gasoline station, but that QW site housed a Standard Oil refinery. Are we just being naive or is the science advanced enough to make that site as safe as any other site that never had such a use?
44, 45 the question was “Is this something that has been done regularly and successfully in the past or is this basically just a new concept with unproven results?” My answer stands. Its not new and LIC is not the first place where this is being done. All over the country and around he world brownfield sites are being reclaimed and redeveloped. This is a big trend as major cities very often was home to heavy industry. With gobalization the need for and profitabilty of manufacturing in cities like London and NY has decline. Many cities are trying to reclaim this land and return it to productive use. If you want to know more about the subject do some research on it. I am not aware of any long term studies which would be needed to answer the questions which you are raising, but this is not so new that it is impossible to say that it can be done safely and has been done safely.
So basically we have to trust DEC and the engineers that remediation can be done safely. But there isn’t any conclusive evidence or long-term data that proves the site will be safe.
If I had the choice, I think I would live on a site that never housed such dangerous uses. There are plenty of these locations in LIC.
yeah, but they’re not on the waterfront and ego is a dominating force in NYC… that and greed. (also art and stuff too though, don’t get me wrong)
That not what I said. I said this is not a new practice therefore it should be possible to say that it can be done safely and has been done safely. I am not aware of any long term studies that have been done, but that fact is not surprising since I have done no research on the issue. If you are concerned I suggest you hit the local library and see what you can find.
Standard Oil did not have a refinery on QW land. You may be thinking of the Newtown Creek mess.
I just saw the ny1 piece on this. What a gross distortion of the facts – “like putting your head in a bucket of gasoline” – give me a break! I walk by there every day and rarely smell a thing. I guess some people will say anything to get on tv.
you must have your head stuck in the wrong place then! it stinks over there. i would agree with that analogy.
50, not true. The Pepsi bottling plant was once a Standard Oil refinery.
No. 51, if you’re going to make accusations of gross distortion of facts, you should make sure you get your own facts straight. You misquoted the guy. Here’s what he actually said: “It literally smells as if someone walked up to me with a pail of gasoline and asked me to stick my head in it.”
#54, were you always this anal?
Yes, it was a Standard Oil refinery before the Pepsi plant was built on top of it. Years ago, a retired Pepsi employee told me that the most toxic soil in the QW development would probably be found on the Pepsi site.
The <NY1 video about the smell.
56, My dad once told me that when he and his friends used to play on the waterfront in the 1930s, there was a large, noxious pool of waste oil on the refinery site. That must be one of the sources of contamination being dealt with today.
46, I did do my research and have spoken with two nationally known experts. To be clear, I am not suggesting the site should not be cleaned. Nonetheless it is not good policy to sicken people while doing the clean ip.
The very simple point is that the measures to protect the community were not adequate. The reason I know this is because after weeks of complaints they finally did something that now seems to be working. This is after being stone walled and told “what smell?” “Maybe it’s the graffiti on the wall I’m smelling” and other lame comments. The way they are monitoring and how they are handling reports from the community has not been what it could be. It should not have taken so much effort to get some relatively minor changes in place.
I hope the present measures are adequate.
#51, it is not a distortion. There have been numerous reports via email, phone, and here to that effect. I’m glad it seems to be better this week.
By the way, the reporter herself nearly dropped her camera when she was hit by a pocket of fume during the filming. I think up to that point she was a bit skeptical. If you go back and watch the piece you’ll see she makes the comment to the effect that “the smell was definitely there today.”
46, The long term study would be simple to implement right now because there will be a lull between this remediation and the next. Perfect situation for a controlled sampling. Canvas the neighborhood and accumulate data on any changes in minor or major health issues – i.e. sore throat, dizziness, etc. It would be a starting point.
Yikes! Only problem is the smell wasn’t there yesterday. But then there wouldn’t be anything to report on tv and they came all the way down there for the story…. So let’s all say that it really smells (like gasoline no less – even though the site isn’t polluted with gasoline) and make yucky faces at the camera.
Charlie, the smell I have experienced from the water is similar to the outside. The scent resembles petrol/natural gas with an earthy base. I actually said something about the water a while back and I was ignored. If the water supply is in any contact with such pollutants then thats a pretty big issue. Especially when there are campaigns going on promoting the consumption of tap water. Growing up in NY we have always had good (tasting) water in NYC but with all the old pipe infrastructure you never know.
A quick way to remedy this is via a home based water analysis. I bet you could build a small product of this nature and make it available to the consumer market. This would make water testing accessible to most people so we don’t have to trust everything we read and hear. Have the device interface digitally so data can be shared online creating a world user database of water supply quality.
As for the outside, the smell is greatest when the air isn’t stirring as much. It is indeed stronger as you approach the remediation site. Head over to the football pitch if you are curious.
With AIG backing the project it’s obvious the parties involved with all the cleanup and development are well protected. This of course means there IS a problem and these entities are covering their backs (always good business to do so). Beyond this I too hope they can get cleaned up as soon as possible but they should be taking every precaution they can to protect those in the surrounding area.
One big problem I have with all this that could be solved easily is the covering of the dump trucks hauling the dirt out. Whenever I see them they never have the canvas/black netting material over on their tops. In fact all the trucks I saw didn’t even have the distinctive roller above the cabin that either auto-covers the bay or can be simply pulled over and latched. Surely this can be done at the very least? =\
And #51 it was a Standard Oil site, I have old industrial maps that show a bit of the business that has gone on here. Also, If you look to industrial rev photo archives you can see how crazy it was over here when all the smoke stacks were going strong. Back then I am sure it was amazing just to have things of this nature up and running. Now we have advanced well beyond these days but there are always bound to be left overs.
As people have stated, hopefully it is cleaned up quickly but safely. I don’t mind a couple more months for a cleaner process. There is always a better way to do things and if it was my trade I would force something more efficient…probably make a killing yeah?
Why am I not suprised by who appears in this video?
64, Why am I not surprised that any time someone stands up for an issue of importance there is someone like you ready to tear them down as if they have some kind of evil motive? I suppose the NY1 reporter who remarked about the fumes is part of the liberal media conspiracy.
Why can’t you just be open about your agenda and show enough integrity to make a reasonably intelligent argument for your point or against mine? Why instead do you resort to a subtle and sometimes not so subtle form of personal attack? And why on earth are you attacking people who have finally succeeded in getting the remediation company to try to plug a variety of admitted loopholes?
Do you really think I have wanted to spend my time on this crap? I am happy that there are finally some results. If you haven’t experienced the fumes, you are among the fortunate ones. I hope that if there is a point where if it does occur again and you happen to get a powerful whiff, you will be honest enough to report back here that you may have been mistaken.
#65, sorry – Many thanks to the “Long Island City Community” for taking leadership on this position. You always represent us well. When is the next meeting?
I think our next target should be all the car shops in the area. Every time I walk by I get hit by pockets of fumes. And how about that garbage company on 5th Street – I nearly drop my camera every time I walk past that place. And how about that bakery – think about what those smells do to sap the will of dieters across the community. We have only scratched the surface of things we can find to complain about.
66, here we go again. You have a real fixation on that LIC Community label that has already been explained to you on this blog at least 3 or 4 times. Get off it. None of the non-politicians in this ad hoc gathering ever presented themselves as representing the community. I should point out that the politicians who were there do play a role in representing the community. But apparently just the act of making any noise that might upset the sacred cause of development gets you all worked up.
Why don’t you call a news conference to report your special knowledge that this is all a fake?
67, how about the delightful aroma of a blog brat unwilling to become involved with anything beneficial to the neighborhood but with tons of time to snipe at anyone who raises a valid concern.
The smell has never bothered me. But if there are others out there who are bothered by the smells and they are also not known to be opponents of development, they should get out there and make their voices heard. Otherwise people will just assume the anti-development crowd is exaggerating things as just another front in anti-development fight.
I have the great distinction of being both pro-development and anti toxic debris. Having both a young child and a business in this community puts me on both sides of the issue. I want thousands of new residents here to spend money, but I also want my child to grow up without stomach cancer or respiratory problems. These sites have yet to be properly monitored, it seems to be that the developers get away with “murder” until NY1 is called in; remember the Avalon? There should be some happy medium between concerned residents, new residents, home owners concerned with their property values and the general community. There is no way that this kind of reckless digging would be allowed in Chelsea, Tribeca or any other NYC neighborhood other than the Bronx.
70, 71 Thank you for bringing intelligence and sensitivity back to this thread. When the discussion gets hot headed and polarized, the community loses.
Additionally, the idea of “anti-development”versus “pro-development” is a stereotype that diverts the discussion from substance. And it is often a false label. This is the same as the “either you are with us or against us” mentality that allows no room for diverse thinking and creative growth. There are many people who favor growth and at the same time want to preserve a quality of life and health. That should be a community wide concern – not a battle ground.
I just don’t understand the motivation of those who want to shout this discussion down. Even this site’s host, who takes in development and real estate dollars and has testified in favor of the OCA variance, is on the side of this issue.
No offense #72, but you have to have your head pretty far in the sand not to acknowledge that there is a segment of the community that jumps pretty quick to oppose development (or any change for that matter). There is a dang good article on the subject here.
http://www.planetizen.com/node/34505
I think the articel is spot on (every public meeting here starts with people complaining about lack of notice). The article also points out that the NIMBY crowd provides a useful function.
I don’t pretend to have any other idea about what can be done on the Pepsi site but attempt to clean it up and cope with all the odors and other annoyances likely to result from such an undertaking. Still, I just think it is the height of hubris to believe that a heavily contaminated site of an oil refinery can be made perfectly safe for residential use, regardless of whether dump trucks are covered, foam is sprayed, and whatever other window dressing is applied to mask the hazards being unearthed there. I know life in NYC demands we have to live in denial about many things, but this is just plain stupid. The same people who only buy organic produce, wash their clothes with Seventh Generation liquid, and pack antibacterial wipes in their kids’ lunch boxes will likely move into a place that could pose much graver dangers to their health than the petty things most people obsess about. The lengths people will go to fool themselves just strikes me as very strange.
71 you reveal your true colors or (or lack of knowledge) when you refer to the cleanup as “reckless digging.” There is nothing reckless about it. The cleanup is being closely monitored by the State DEC under a plan that was developed with them. Queens West has a highly respected environmental engineer overseeing the project who visits the site on a regular basis (in addition to DEC personnel) to make sure work is being done according to the plan. The plan itself calls for enclosed tents over the areas being excavated and all trucks are washed down before leaving the facility. The streets are washed down regularly as well. The fact of the matter is that there is very little by way of noxious odors emanating from the site. So how can you refer to this process as reckless? Do you know a better way to do it? I for one would like to see the place cleaned up (as is being done) so that the long promised waterfront parks that are planned can come to fruition. Ultimately it is the taxpayers who are paying for this through the brownfield program and i would like to see our money spent wisely. You smell less walking past this site than you do passing a neighborhood dry cleaning shop, car repair place or gas station.
Just curious, No. 75, do you think global warming is a farce? The earth is flat? Evolution is make believe?
74 i don’t understand how cleaning up this site is the height of hubris. There is oil in the dirt, which is being removed from the site and replaced with clean soil. What would you rather do – fence off the area and leave it polluted forever? How does oil five or six feet underground make the land above unsafe for habitation? Particularly for someone living in a highrise apartment with a thick pad of concrete separating them from any possible contamination? If you really feel that way then you should move out of LIC (if you live here) because there is oil and other contamination under the ground throughout this area. Queens West is probably the safest place to live around here.
Not at all 76. I believe in science and the competence of the environmental engineers who are monitoring the clean up of this site. I also believe in my own nose and know that this issue is being created by a bunch of neighborhood gadflies and politicians with nothing better to do than create a stink where none exists. I also support Barak Obama. Sorry i don’t fit your expectations.
Do you believe the neighborhood is perfect the way it is and nothing should ever change? Do you believe it is a bad thing to clean up polluted sites?
77, if you read what I wrote more closely, you’ll see that I said cleaning up the site is probably the only option available. But regardless of what happens at the site, I still believe that it will never be a safe, healthy place to live and disturbing the site is probably doing a whole lot of damage to everyone’s health. That’s all. We have all been trained to believe everything “experts” tell us. Sometimes, if it smells bad (no pun), it probably is.
#74 you sound very certain that the method that is being used to clean up the sites do not work in the short term and the long term. I myself am not sure if they do work but wanted to know if you have studies that show that this type of remediation is not effective.
I attended a conference sponsored by ULI (Urban Land Institute), which is a respected land use organization, on the Queenswest development. They described how Avalon had dug 30′ of contaminated dirt, than caped it with a barrier and replaced it with clean dirt in AR II. I am not sure if there is much more that could be done other than leaving the site untouched and undeveloped. Is there other technology that is not being used that should be?
80, I don’t pretend to have any answers. I’m just viewing this through a skeptical lens of an Average Joe and have concluded (maybe quite wrongly) that there’s no way to guarantee that residents and workers are not going to be harmed during (and after) this work is done. This is a refinery we’re talking about here, not just some old parking lot with a couple of spilled cans of motor oil. If developers really wanted to ensure safe re-use of the site, why not just leave the site alone, pour a thick layer of concrete over the entire site, add piles of clean dirt on top, and make the whole thing into a park? Surely that would add to the viability and attractiveness of LIC as a developing neighborhood more than another tower.
81, your true colors have been revealed. I will come back to you later.
I am 64, and I will respond to the attacks levied against me. First let me say that I think it is proper and appropriate to ask questions and take steps to ensure that this is done as quickly and as safely as possible. However, one must also ask what the motivations are of those that are in front of the complaints regarding the clean-up efforts. People should know that those being interviewed in front of cameras have a decade plus long track record (public record) of opposing and complaining about Citylights, Queens West, Gantry Park, the strip park on 48th, Blend, bike lanes, CUNY, etc. etc. Anything that would improve the area, make it more livable or gentrify it is met with strong opposition from this core group of malcontents. The plays from their play book have been honed to the point of perfection. Rarely is there a direct frontal attack. Sure go ahead and open a restaurant– I’m pro-development, but sorry I oppose your liquor license as there are too many bars in a 500 ft radius. Or yes I’m in favor of CUNY and QCA and the environmental remediation, oh but wait no zoning variances for you to make this possible. They speak out of both sides of their mouth and pay lip service to development, but the real agenda is to stymie any activity that causes any further changes in LIC. These guys play fast and loose with the facts using hyperbole and half truths to make their points. Their record on this goes back to the early 90’s. So when some one gets on TV and says “It literally smells as if someone walked up to me with a pail of gasoline and asked me to stick my head in it.” I roll my eyes and see more of the same. That’s why I’m not surprised. Does all of LIC really smell like your head is immersed in gasoline? Don’t you think that is a bit of an exaggeration? If it did smell that strong wouldn’t we all be dead in the streets from poisoning? This clean-up should not be used to advance anyone’s anti-development agenda. Again I applaud the efforts of anyone who has brought this to attention of the public and is taking steps to mitigate the results, but I can’t help but ask the question – To what end is this being done?
Coming back to you #81, your recommendation all sounds strangely familiar – ah yes the CUNY site where the LICC is promoting the same quick and dirty fix. Let’s be clear on this point: Where there is environmental problems I am in favor of rooting them out in the most aggressive fashion. This should be pursued in as diligent, but as expeditious manner as possible. Any remediation plan will involved some stirring up of toxity, but better it be done over a few month period than linger in the topsoil where people are exposed to it for many years. Every effort should be made and no expense spared in protecting the community while this takes place. While no approach is 100% the one described seems infinitely better than pretending it is not there and putting a park over it where children will come into direct contact with it. That’s just stupid.
82. Forgive me, but you sound just a tad paranoid. I have nothing to do with LICC or any other agenda, track record, pro or anti (and I’m not voting for either Obama or McCain).
I just offered my humble opinion (in 81 and 74) that maybe it isn’t such a great idea to stir up an old refinery and stick a building on top of it. That doesn’t seem like an especially explosive position to take.
I’ve sent my emails. Has anyone else?
82, you are so caught up in attacking people based solely on personal opinion that you are mixing up people who are posting here and acting as if they are one and the same. You also seem particularly intent on attacking some people who have taken the liberty to speak their views. Anonymously calling them liars is really not fair.
Since you seem sure about who some of these people are, why don’t speak directly with them? Have you ever directly talked at length with the people you are attacking here? So how do you know who any of us are or what we think? From an edited sound bite?
Can you possibly examine the idea that you might be mistaken about some of your opinions about people?
82 is unaware that many of the improvements he or she is appreciating today are because local folks fought bad proposals until they got better. The strip park is an example of where the community was not listened to. The Gantry park is an example of where the community was listened to.
As someone who has complained about the odors I was also the first to publicly compliment the remediator on finally controlling the fumes. But the new measures were only put into place as a result of people hammering away.
82 obviously was not in the immediate area the week of 8/25 where there were intense gasoline-like fumes. If you speak to the roving monitor he can confirm this.
Right on, 86. Every advance, reform, and improvement that has ever been made in the history of this country was the result of people first opening their mouths and complaining loudly.
#82 – you seem to have a lot of opinions. could you then explain to us why the area surrounding the remediation tents has stunk of gasoline and oil and why the public shouldn’t be concerned about this?
Anyone else see this?
“Mayor of Long Island City” killed on Crescent Street:
http://gothamist.com/2008/09/04/punch_to_the_face_kills_queens_man.php
88, please reread my post before asking that. In there I said clearly that it is proper and appropriate to ask questions and take steps to ensure that this is done as quickly and as safely as possible. I am only questioning the motivations of those that are in front of the complaints regarding the clean-up efforts and to what ends are their complaints directed? Why attack me for asking the tough questions? I believe that is a completely resonable inquiry.
88 here:
I don’t have the time or energy to go point by point through your post (and I’m new to the neighborhood, not an “old-timer”, before you start to make more assumptions). You wrote about the people interviewed for NY1:
“Anything that would improve the area, make it more livable or gentrify it is met with strong opposition from this core group of malcontents”. !!!! They’re trying to draw attention to the toxic smell and you make this statement? They are trying to make it MORE liveable! So your statements are not even remotely reasonable. This is the reason that development must be met with some opposition. These developers will try to get away with anything and at any cost. We all breathe the same air and I’m sure nobody prefers to get cancer from it.
“There are many people who favor growth and at the same time want to preserve a quality of life”
What does that mean specifically? Seriously all jokes aside. People throw out that statement all the time and I’m not sure what it means. Is it possible to do both? What type of growth is bad because it affects quality of life vs growth which is good? Inquiring minds want to know.
92, yes – if I can assume you are also 82 this is finally a reasonably stated question without the sarcasm, innuendo, and personal attack. If you are also 90, maybe I’m reading it wrong but I feel there is a suspicious angry bent that was very apparent in prior posts.
Since I used the phrase “preserve quality of life” I’ll agree it’s difficult to directly define but you would have to agree that it is equally difficult to always know how a project will impact the community for better or worse. If we were a more coherent community perhaps we could as a group find the balance of views I am trying to describe.
But getting back to this idea of questioning the motivations, you seem to be constantly implying that they are either self-serving or rigidly backward looking or just protesting for the sake of protesting. I honestly don’t see what the gain would be. Perhaps you could explain. As for backward looking, I could try to parade my credentials as to local development projects I have had a proactive hand in but I would rather do that face to face. And protesting for protesting is just not something any of us have time for in this economy. I don’t know about you but I have a lot on my plate and taking the time to try to find out why my block smelled of fumes was not fun. But the very fact that the fumes are not here for the past few days shows that we have had a positive impact where we were being stone walled before.
92 and 82, the only way your arguments would have even the slightest dint of logical credibility is if the people who complained about the gas smell were also working behind the scenes to stop the construction of the tower on that site (which, of course, isn’t the case). And even then, this would mean we have to accept your specious claims that there is no gas smell, when hundreds of other people have been hacking in the street and the contractors themselves acknowledge the odor problem. So who does a reasonably open-minded person believe — you, who seems to support the actions of developers no matter what the consequences, or them?
It seems to me that we have to accept that the odor-complainers are just concerned neighbors — people who you should find common ground with on this issue and others for the good of the neighborhood — who want to hold the engineers and the state to the construction remediation standards they themselves agreed to. That’s the pact all of us have made with the developers in LIC, and it seems more than fair to complain if they break it.
93, I asked because everyone says that they are not backwards and that they are for progress, however its very easy to say that. Perhaps if I can rephrase the question maybe you would have a easier time answering it. There has been a lot of development in LIC in the past decade. Which development stands out in your mind as a project that did not infringe on the “quality of life” in LIC?
94, that is exactly the point! The people who complained about the gas smell were also the exact same people working behind the scenes to stop the construction of the tower on the CUNY site. They are also the same people who have worked against the Queens West development since day one. So while the QW tower is not being directly questioned here it is not necessarily unusual that it is not. #73 posted a link to a great article about the MO of these neighborhood groups. If you have the time read it. If you have any familiarity with the history of the area when you read it would sound like it was written specifically about LIC. It is standard practice to dismantle every facet of a contested project in any way possible which is why I feel that my questions is relevant to the discussion here. How do you or I know when there is a legitimate issue vs. a small issue that is being blown out of proportion for political gain? This is the story of the boy who cried wolf too many times. When you are against almost every new development, it become hard to tell when there is a real problem or when it is more posturing.
This issue has nothing to do with anti development. The toxicity on this particular site is of great concern to both new comers on the waterfront as well as long time residents. Remember, the Pepsi Plant was built on top of an oil refinery back in the day when buildings went up on sites with little regard as to what lay beneath their development. The NY1 visit to the site was a last minute decision; therefore, there was no way the entire community could have been alerted to show up in great numbers. BTW there is an article in today’s Daily News re: Assembly Woman Cathy Nolan’s recommendation to the DEC.
#95, it’s coincidence that the opposition to CUNY are the same people who pioneered the call to investigate the harmful smell on the community. They are mutually exclusive situations, and though they may seem like an anti-development group, they really are pro-community. I think they (and it would be great if they had a name that was agreed upon and not the LIC Community) function as community watchdogs, and even though we might not agree with all of their agendas, their fundamental concern is for the people of the neighborhood. And, I am not a part of their group and I am concerned about the toxic situation being discussed her. It’s a community matter, what difference does it make who is bringing up the issue? It’s a real issue.
Instead of calling them “the community”, how about using one of the acronyms from the article #73 posted and call them the CAVE people. Just kidding.
Oh why won’t LIQCity post some new stuff so we could at lease move this feud to a new thread.
95, I give up. How can anyone have a reasoned debate with you? You must drive your friends, family, and colleagues up a wall. You remind me of a certain highly unpopular national figure who refuses to let stubborn things like facts, rational thought, and objectivity get in the way of his blinkered thinking.
How do you know this has nothing to do with anti-development? I’m not so sure. Please help me get to where you are. No one is questioning whether this is an issue. What is being questioned is motivation. You may be content being potentialy manipulated into supporting a cause you don’t believe in, but I am not. I like to ask questions before throwing my support behind something.
99, (I assume also 93) I am just trying to understand. Please answer my question. Maybe you and I are not so different after there is an understanding of sorts.
There has been a lot of development in LIC in the past decade. Which development stands out in your mind as an example of a project that did not infringe on the “quality of life” in LIC?
#101 – I am #96 – Why do you “assume” that I am being “manipulated” into anything? Remember – to “assume” is to make an a$$ out of you and me. I stand by my statement. This issue is not about anti development, and I think that you are trying to turn it into one!
102, I’m 93 but not 99. Hmmm, where to begin? It’s easy to make a blanket statement that these are the same people who opposed this and that and therefore…. Therefore what?
If for example we questioned why the original plan had minimal to zero waterfront access, did that make us anti-development? If people are asking where is the promised library, does that make us anti-development?
In the case of O’Connor Associates there is a generally welcome lower rise CUNY dorm but it is attached to a luxury tower that breaches zoning and requires several other variances to change light, air, and even fire department access. Some of us have simply asked the Board of Standards that if they are going to give extra benefit please make sure that the hardship from the remediation is real.
I would point out that it was only at the most recent hearing that OCA admitted that they will benefit from Brownfield funds. Prior to that they claimed the program barely existed and that no one other than “a lone farmer upstate” had ever received Brownfield funds. So who would have been “potentially manipulated” in this instance?
Motivation? I do wish the direction of the neighborhood was not to look at Manhattan but at the same time I am realistic. It does not mean I can’t ask questions like how is everyone going to fit on the #7.
I like your statement: “Maybe you and I are not so different after there is an understanding of sorts.” I suspect this may be true. And where we disagree, what’s wrong with trying to respect where we are coming from?
I suggest that 104 invites that other plonker out for a beer tonight and report back to us. You’ll either find common ground or mash each other in the face.
105, unfortunately the one place where this would have been best just closed.
104, again that’s all very nice, and I appreciate your response, but I can’t help but feel that you are avoiding my question. Let’s not rehash CUNY all over again. I am familiar with your basis of objection to many of these projects, but you are not answering my question. There has been a lot of development in LIC in the past decade. Which development stands out in your mind as an example of a project that did not infringe on the “quality of life” in LIC?
Again the reason I ask is because you said that you favor development that does not infringe on the quality of life. Can you cite a LIC development that you were in favor of?
#98 new threads coming on Monday. everyone needs a break from time to time. :) and this is a really interesting and important discussion actually. Toxic remediation is a major issue for our community.
107, does it need to be black and white? But ok since you ask. Arris from my perspective and with little knowledge of what folks have trouble with seems to be built in an area and in a way where nothing was diminished and something was improved. Badge, which is much closer to home seems to be non-intrusive, conforming and with a design that blends with what is there. The newest East Coast has nice design lines though I couldn’t cough up the money for an apt there. I like the park-like terrace on the 9th Fl of is that also an East Coast? Sorry I’m not good with the names. I like the Food Cellar. There are no new businesses along Vernon that I have a problem with at present even though I support the 500 foot rule when it applies. The Duane Reade doesn’t thrill me but I think Vernon Pharmacy will survive. I love Gantry Park.
Look, I keep trying to explain that I know ‘quality of life’ is subjective. In part, there is nostalgia for a quieter more intimate neighborhood, but in a more serious and forward thinking vein it’s about desiring a transition to the new which does not completely steam roller over the old. Houses for example used to be bought by people who wanted to live in them and often improve them. Nowadays every property is a potential knock down and redevelop at a larger scale site. The result is everyone wants in on that – except for a few of us backward types – and this puts further pressure on all the quaint things that attracted folks here in the first place. I feel there could be a more natural and sustainable development but I’m not gonna go there because you will start asking “what does that mean?”
This is a long, long discussion that perhaps has no resolution but I certainly don’t have the view that development is all bad.
As 109, the LIQCity name is incorrect. It got placed there automatically by a cookie? Is there a way to fix this buggy behavior?
I know that this is a variation on the theme of this thread; but while reading all of these posts, the following came to mind.
All of these polluted sites everywhere, which are in need of remediation, are due to the lack of foresight, or knowledge, and/or the desire to do the right thing when the knowledge was available, by those who came before us. This is what they left the succeeding generations. This is why it is so important that the current generations do the right thing, and not leave behind more stuff , to be remediated by those who will exist in the decades and centuries to come.
Regulations are in place for good reason. They didn’t exist way back when. People bitch and moan (and rightly so) about all the toxic stuff that endangers us today, which was left behind yesterday. Those who bitch and moan today, and who might be in positions of power, to be able to prevent tommorrow’s generations from looking back on us with the same irreverence, should do so, instead of skimping for reasons of profit.
I’m not relating or comparing this to any specific debate/argument in this thread, but just voicing what I believe to be basic common sense and consideration.
Charlie.
Yes agreed, this is a discussion that has no resolution especially on a blog, but it is good to hear your view even though I do not agree with all of it. I’m still confused by what some of it all means, but please also consider that just as much as you do not like the feeling of trying to steam roll over the old, there are those of us who do not want nostalgia crammed down our throats. Many were attracted to living here by the changes that are happening here and we want more of the same. Neither group has exclusive right to what becomes of LIC. Somehow we must find a way to co-exist and that does not mean that things should be put into a time capsule and freeze development. Reasonable efforts to develop should not be hindered by a desire for nostalgia. The will of a small group should not be imposed on the larger group.
By the way nice post by Charlie in #111
#109 Maybe you would have a different opinion if you lived next to the Badge building. Once all the noise, dust and debris ended we are left with 8 stories with balconies looking down on us. Less light, more noise and less privacy. We have no choice in the matter except to get used to it.
112, Nostalgia was mentioned once and only in passing and then the post moved on to the more serious concerns so you shouldn’t be so hung up on that. I’m also not aware of any attempts to cram nostalgia down anyone’s throat.
My experience has been that it’s more often the young newcomers who push the idea that the so-called old neighborhood has to get out of the way for so-called progress. It’s a strange feeling for those of us who have been here for the long haul and will still be here after the condos have flipped and many of these vocal people have moved on.
I think all people want is that their opinions not be so quickly judged and boxed into convenient stereotypical molds and especially that their activism not be treated as having some sort of bad intent.
Yes, I agree that charlie’s post was very good. He expanded on what I meant when I briefly wrote that “the Pepsi Plant was built back in the day when buildings went up on sites with no regard as to what lay beneath their developments”.
#112, you say
“My experience has been that it’s more often the young newcomers who push the idea that the so-called old neighborhood has to get out of the way for so-called progress. It’s a strange feeling for those of us who have been here for the long haul and will still be here after the condos have flipped and many of these vocal people have moved on.”
You have to know that if that was phrased the other way around, you would blow a gasket. I don’t think if matters how long you have been here. You could have lived here for a hundred years and if your ideas stink, they stink. Likewise, if you just moved here and have good ideas, then great. By the way, my family has been here for over 3 generations but I admit that sometimes my ideas for the neighborhood suck.
Sorry, meant #114.
116, of course you are right but you did not perhaps notice it was in response to people jumping on the word nostalgia. Unfortunately some people did not catch the nuance and instead jumped on that as the only reason people want to preserve the neighborhood.
The simple point regarding ‘quality of life’ that seems to so baffle 107 is this. There are people who have lived a relatively quiet almost rural life here and this includes the real old timers and the first wave of gentrification – those of us who came in the late 70′s and 80′s. The neighborhood maintained its character as it grew. The present situation where buildings that are way larger in scale are plunked down among the smaller residential enclaves has given us frequent loud parties that go into the early hours of the morning, less light, less privacy, more strained parking, denser platforms on the subway, more sewer back ups, more dog sh*t on the sidewalk, and continual calls and people showing up at our door who want to buy our home. There are blocks that have been under continual construction for several years. Our homes get filled with dust. The block gets filled with debris. We are woken often before legal hours by cranes backing up and workers banging and chattering. And some homes have sustained serious damage.
So preservation is not an abstract concept. It’s a physical reality where we are trying to preserve the time and space we call life. with all due respect, I just think that this is not easily grasped by those fortunate enough not to experience these things.
118, I agree with most of your characterization and found myself feeling slightly depressed after reading it. But having lived in LIC most of my life, I don’t know how you can say we ever enjoyed a “relatively quiet almost rural life here.” Be careful, because you are inviting the hysterical pro-development fringe to jump down your throat and ignore anything else you have to say and portray you as some kind of backward yahoo. Still, I think you are quite correct in how you describe the effects of the constant disruption of the past several years, which in many ways surpasses the din of the old factories that all shuttered their doors at 4pm. Many days, it’s hard to see the bright side of what LIC will be when one is forced to endure such tumult day in and day out.
I would be more than happy to grin and bear it for another 5, 10, 20 years if I were sure LIC would turn out to be a place I would be able to enjoy again as much as I used to. Despite the many improvements in the physical look of the place and the buzz brought in by some wonderful residents and new businesses, values today, why do I feel things are not on the right track?
I get turned off by the constant talk of real estate by those who seem to see a place to live as only a commodity to be traded for a quick profit. Everyone comes and goes, and barely knows each other anymore. Everyone seems to be looking for that constantly stimulating sugar rush all the time, which has crowded out anyone who doesn’t buy into this manic way of living. It’s the ADD-ification of the LIC, a place that is looking more alienating to me by the minute.
I’m not hung up on nostalgia. Having nostalgia crammed down your throats = opposing legitimate developments under the guise of protecting “light and air” = having your personal views and lifestyle preferences being pushed on me. I don’t want a quiet and almost rural life. Call it nostalgia or whatever you want to call it. I simply define it as being against something simply because it changes some undefinable and unexplainable aspect of the neighborhood in a way that you may perceive as negative.
120, I don’t think you have anything to worry about. You seem to be getting exactly what you want in LIC. Good luck! And maybe you’ll even decide to stick around for another couple of years before you head off somewhere else that needs to be turned upside down for you.
Sorry my ego is not that big to think that what is happening in LIC is being done to suit me personally, but there are those who think that LIC should reflect their own individual wishes. Where is your contempt for them?
120, Please go back on your medication. You were more rational and almost pleasant to talk to. Now you just have gone back to the same tired rant and you either cannot read or you are intentionally twisting words. And so I will completely withdraw the statement about nostalgia and rural life since you have abused it. It’s not about nostalgia or rural life. If you want to try to understand it, read 119 who has it right.
“Under the guise of air and light?” Please stop this abusive nonsense. If you want a real discussion great, I’m there. If you want to push baseless portrayals of people’s motives, you’ve completely lost me.
#119, we’re actually going to move to Hunter’s Point this Spring because it feels, to us, much LESS like that than other neighborhoods we’ve considered such as DUMBO. The difference is palpable. We’ve met a range of nice genuine people leading interesting low-”sugar” lives in quite a short span of time since we started spending time in the neighborhood over the past month. We’re hoping that LIC will appeal to people new and old, who want to work together to maintain/strengthen a strong caring community. We’re really looking forward to moving to the neighborhood.
To #124: Welcome.
122, Why should there be contempt for anyone who wants their neighborhood to reflect their ideas of what a neighb should be. I don’t have a problem with a diversity of views and realities. The problem I have is when people get personally attacked for expressing their views. You have folks who want to attribute all sorts of malicious ulterior motives any time someone opens their mouth.
Went back to No. 199 as you suggested. Can I ask a question? What place do you know of that never changes? I don’t know where LIC will be in another 5, 10, 20 years, but one thing I can guarantee is that it will still be changing. This is the cycle of life. I can’t think of a single neighborhood in NYC that has not undergone change. It may be residential towers, office towers, a new influx of a particular economic group, race, religion, change in retail services, addition of services, loss of services, people leaving an area, etc. To think that there is a light at the end of a tunnel is naive. What I am saying is that the LIC you came to love died a long time ago and its not coming back. You may be able to knock a few floors off a building, but this is the equivalent of puting a finger in a leaking dam. That leaves a tough choice for many – embrace (or at least tolerate) change, look for greener pastures, or be miserable. Sorry, just being honest. When you arrived in the first wave of gentrification, do you think everyone was happy to see you? Or how about when the city started to encourage industrial business to move to LIC? Did rents go up? Was there less parking? Did business that were here for years find that they were incompatible with the new residents? Do you forget that or think that things were somehow different then?
Even up until about 4 years ago, I envisioned Hunters Point slowing becoming a blend of the old and new, mainly due to the snail’s pace of Queens West. It appeared to be going along those lines for about seven years. All of that changed in July of 2005, when NYC lost the Olympic host city bid to London.
What I, and many others did not see, was all of the private development which was to pop up from of the drafting tables and onto foundations, in such a short period of time.
The change that is happening is much to rapid to be adapted to easily, especially by those who’ve lived here and were adapted to life, in probably the last “small town” to exist in the middle of a huge metropolis.
Change is inevitable, and big time change it is, for the small town of Hunters Point.
It appears that what was, is rapidly being replaced by what is, and what is to shortly be here. Of course, at some time down the road, this all will be replaced by what is to come. Change is the only thing in the Universe which is guaranteed. Without it, time itself would serve no purpose.
Huge buildings full of boxes rising up next to the smaller ones with a few boxes, is bound to have a huge impact on any neighborhood. It’s the poeple inhabiting those boxes who will define what the neighborhood will become, and who will have to live with their choices. Having the newcomers go at it with the old timers, does no good with respect to developing a new community; and a new one is what is needed. Only mutual respect and cooperation will best serve all.
A neighborhood is a place where people reside. A community is a place where people with a common goal, live together and interact . That common goal is to make the place they live, as comfortable, as pleasurable, as safe, and as convenient as possible .
The question is: do you want to draw up sides, and make it us vs. them, or do you ultimately want the same thing, and are really just looking at it from differing perspectives? Work together towards the common goal; community.
Charlie.
Great post, Charlie. However, does everyone really want a community? Sounds like it might be a bit of wishful thinking. How many people in NYC (LIC included) don’t even know their neighbors? And then where does that leave us?
Yup, there will be those who will want to draw up sides, no matter what. Then there will always be those who don’t care, one way or the other. There will be the transients, and then there will be the investors who buy, but who might not even live here.
Hunters Point was a neighborhood and community where everyone (basically, at least) knew virtually everyone else. Neighbors’ sons and daughters married each other. multiple generations occupied the same house. Those homes were passed down to succeeding generations. Many had open door policies for their neighbors & friends. Decades ago, many of them were also co-workers in the area. That’s a great part of what gave Hunters Point that small town feel.
It is wishful thinking (of sorts), but the sentiment and idea is valid. Hey, ya can’t blame a guy for trying, especially if it’s on a positive note.
Charlie.
The idea that change is inevitable so therefore you must accept it or get out, ignores one very important point – namely who is responsible for how change takes place? This is no different than saying that one should accept the price of oil and not question if there is a way to make changes in how we use energy, where we derive it, etc.
Development is not an inevitable act of nature like a hurricane. It comes about from a mix of public policy and entrepreneurial ambition.
There are some who seem to believe that private ambition should always take precedence over public policy. This is no different from the corporations that whined and cried when the public demanded pollution controls.
127, the first wave of gentrification adapted itself to the neighborhood. It did not uproot it. I’m certain as you say that there were some who did not welcome it. But by in large those of us who arrived became close friends and associates with those who were here and our goal was to work with what was here and make it better. We did not knock down homes to build condos. We fixed up what was here and settled here.
Even where we disagreed, there was mutual respect. I used to spend hours with one of the old time community leaders shooting the sh*t even though we were on complete opposite sides of many issues. There was a sense that even if the thinking was not the same, it did not mean the world was divided into good and evil. It’s something I miss in the polarized anonymous world of blogging.
131, well put (I’m 119). You and Charlie touch on the issue that’s most paramount for me: how to ensure a real community in LIC flourishes again when the blizzard of development finally quiets down. Self-interested developers (none of whom have any long-term connection to LIC) are calling all of the shots right now, for better or worse. The population seems too fractured and conflicted to act as an equal foil to the developers to shape the area we’re all going to live in. I also see no cohesive or understandable public policy emerging anywhere else — from the local pols to our reluctant community groups (sorry, that’s what they seem to me). They appear happy just to go at each other’s throats and operate too much in the shadows to give me confidence.
Perhaps all of this will change and things will finally come together, as more people like 124 step up and do their part. But right now, it’s difficult for me to see what the end result of this equally grand and infuriating experiment will be.
I just want to make one thing perfectly clear; and that is when I said that change is inevitable, in no way did I say or even imply that you (everyone) must accept it, or get out. In fact, that’s the exact opposite of the point I was trying to make. My point is that change is inevitable, and what is happening here is big time change, really fast. Nothing can reverse what has been set in motion, so it’s best to work together than to debate/argue/fight, to make that change happen as smoothly as it possibly can.
So, don’t start equating or attributing other thoughts or examples, to what I said in my post # 128.
Charlie.
Oh, strike the word debate from the previous post #134. Debate is a good thing. arguing and fighting is counter productive.
Charlie.
Yes, question the price of oil, but in the end what can you and I actually do to solve the issue? There are much bigger factors at play than any one individual, state or group of states can do to address it. The same is true here. Who is responsible for how change takes place? Everyone and no one. Demographics, social and economic shifts, globalization, politicicians, media, economics, buying preferences, business owners, government, residents. You suggest the public policy is being ignored. I feel that it is being addressed. The greater public good is being served by development in LIC. The is no public policy benefit to maintaining that certain undefined character of pre-1990 LIC.
Lets be serious here. Everyone know that LIC = Citylights. Nuff Said.
The opinions of anyone who lives anywehere else in LIC are irrelevant – That includes old timers who slummed it out in the neighborhood before Citylights came to town as the only luxury building in the neighborhood and those who got ripped off in the new wave of condos. We warned you and now you all wish that you lived in Citylights.
136, yes we can get deep and cosmological but there is indeed impact one can have issues local and global. I think turning over and going back to bed is what the larger power players would prefer we do.
As for the public benefit being served by development that’s the same argument being used when eminent domain is invoked to build casinos and hotels. In some cases a valid case can be made but often it’s nothing more than a power play staged by development interests in bed with politicians.
Nowhere is anyone suggesting that the desired public policy is to maintain a prior era. 136, you just can’t seem to let go of your belief that all problems are solved by removing any obstacles to developing as a developer sees fit. Any time anyone suggests any means to examine this and arrive at community or public consensus, you use that as an opportunity to polarize the argument and it’s always toward your backward idea that development is the soul savior of humanity.
137 is that very sad man who just can’t let of his obsession. Everyone, please just ignore him. And we know he isn’t Charlie.
Exactly, 138. Except for this person who is constantly pushing this damn-the-torpedoes approach to development, everyone else on this thread has offered balanced and thoughtful ideas. It’s as if he can’t stomach the notion that people in the community should also have a say in our own affairs. It’s all quite bizarre, and entirely un-American, though I’ll bet he’d be the last person to ever see the irony. He’s now been involved in posts with nearly 500+ comments, and I have yet to see anything reasonable and conciliatory come out of him.
As far as # 137′s post goes; it could be that he/she began writing it before #136 posted, which means that my name was automatically in his/her name box, and which he/she did not check before posting. It also could be another Charlie, as it seems from a prior post, that there may be one. It could also be that my name was used deliberately, to try to throw a wrench in the works of this thread.
As # 139 pointed out; it ain’t me.
Charlie.
If its not Charlie, odds on its Jake. If so he should go back to Queenswest and stop trying ruin this site. Its a shame but the arrogance, or better put, dellusion of some City Lighters gives the whole building the terrible reputation that it has. Despite popular belief, not everyone who lives there is an a-hole.
Again, not me. as in post # 142.
Everyone please check your name box before you post. It appears that everyone’s name box, is automatically filled in with the name of the previous poster who did use a name.
LiQcity, can you do something about this. It only started doing that, when the captcha was added.
Charlie.
(this is #124 again, now with a handle)
Point of clarification– isn’t most the Queens West development replacing toxic brownfields rather than homes? Along those lines, someone somewhere that I read recently made a case that Hunter’s Point is transitioning from commercial to residential more than from residential to gentrified residential, like DUMBO and Tribeca perhaps, and in contrast to Astoria and Williamsburg. I’d love to know from some of the older residents the extent to which you feel that is true in LIC or not.
Regardless, if the future is being determined mostly by developers who you feel don’t care about the neighborhood, then that makes it all the more important for residents new and old work together to articulate a future that we would all be inspired by, and then to organize to influence that future– not to fight or stop change, but to guide it in a positive direction.
What community groups / organizations in LIC do that sort of work?
144, the LICC is very active in this area. I’m not sure where and when they meet though. I also think membership is by invitation only.
Queens West Development Corporation was to develop the Hunters Point waterfront from Anabel Basin to the Bulkhead at Newtown Creek, west of 5th Street, and of 2nd Street. Part of it was to be for commercial purposes. That is no longer. Well, things got all changed around, as they do when projects like this take so long. Now, from Tennisport (50th Ave,) to the north to Anabel Basin will be QWDC, and to the south to Newtown Creek and slighly east to include the Budweiser distributorship, will be (still in the planning stages) Hunters Point South.
All of that area was once (and to some extent, still is) industrial/commercial. In fact, the majority of the coastline along the East River from LIC, down to the Bay Ridge & Dyker Heights area near Ft. Hamilton and the Verazzano-Narrows Bridge, was industrial/commercial, like the Brooklyn Navy Yard and Bush Terminal.
It appears that most of the new buildings, replaced short story commercial buildings (though some had a few apartments), small Apartment bldg/storefronts, or were empty lots. Yes, there’s also been controversy concerning landmark (though not official) buildings like the Hackett Building (49th & Jackson) which housed an early N.Y. Newspaper, and the first seat of Queens County Government.
Because of it’s industrial-commercial-residential nature, Hunters Point’s residential population was always very low. I think (and I could be off, but probably not by much) that only at the height of its industrial activity, did the population ever exceed 4,000.
Charlie.
By “most of the new buildings” in paragraph 3, of my previous post # 146, I am referring to the privately developed ones that are not part of QWDC, or the proposed HPS. Just thought I should clear that up.
Charlie.
#144,
Is “LICC” the acronym for the local Community Board?
The local community board is Community Board 2, or just CB2. LICC is (I believe) Long Island City Community.
Charlie.
LICC was a moniker dubbed by the Board of Standards when some members of the community challenged OCA’s variance/hardhip request for a 13 story tower luxury tower (often mistakenly called the CUNY dorm). It was a convenience that the BSA used to differentiate OCA (O’Connor Associates) from the people who appeared from the community – the majority of them asking that the Board further explore the financials and also maintain the relatively recent zoning.
The media then covered the story as if LICC is an official organized group. The media also took a 300+ signature petition and stretched that to mean that LICC has 300 members. As someone who has appeared in the media I am frustrated that even if I say “x,y,z”, if their article looks best only with “z” that’s what gets published.
Those of us who have been involved one way or another with this effort do not pretend to be a representative group for the entire community. While there is a lot of support for what we have tried to do, we recognize that there are equally strong opinions in a different direction.
Now that makes sense. LICC just seemd like an incomplete name for an organization. Long Island City Community what?
Charlie.
#127 Well said and so true!
Hey did anyone go down to see those crazy boats at Deitch last night? That was some party….I hope some of the thousand or so people there were from LIC…
It really stinks today(9/15), with some sweet detergent-like smell. Wonder what other fumes this smell was designed to mask?
#154 -That aroma may have been coming from the sewage treatment plant in Greenpoint. They used to camoflage the odors with something that smelled like scented soaps or candles. Perhaps they have resumed that practice.
#155 – Greenpoint? Yeah, and I’m an idiot. This townie’s been here 24 years, dude, and you ain’t ever gonna smell the G-point fart factory over here. Nice try, and I hope you weren’t being patronizing and/or you’re not some yuppie cult-member development apologist. I’m a block from the tents, okay? And I am familiar with the prevailing winds and all that, so don’t even try that crap.
http://tinyurl.com/5m8x86
I guess all those City and State employees are part of the local anti-development plot.
Regardless of the complaints of the City and State workers, the tests at the Jackson Avenue building were conducted by the Queens Department of Environmental Protection, which found carbon monoxide (and other undesirable emissions) within safe parameters(NY1 News). However, similar tests have yet to be conducted by the Department of Protecting the People Who Have to Breathe in the Environment.
The smell was sooo bad today. I think the worst it has smelled it a long time.
The DEP can’t find anything harmful. Several workers can vomit or pass out or choke but that’s ok because the readings say they are fine. Anything wrong with this picture?
Your health and your spouse’s health and your childrens’ health are being sacrificed by asleep at the wheel bureaucrats who are doing nothing more than preserving the status quo. They are hiding behind readings that say all is ok but doing **nothing** to investigate why people are being sickened.
For anyone who doubts the comment from a few weeks ago that it’s like having a pail of gasoline in front of you, please go to the corner of 5th St and 47th ave right now and tell us what you experience.
The smell is terrible. It comes in my windows and makes my head hurt. For a while I thought I had a gas leak. I can’t believe that people cannot smell this! My windows are always open and I do not have air condition. This is horrible.
What can we do to stop this?
If it’s happenning right now, call one (or more) of the newschannels and tell them there is an ongoing situation. They have news vans that cruise the city, just for this purpose.
Charlie.
Here are some official resources that addresses this issue:
Progress Report – August 2008 – Queens West Development Site:
http://prod.trcimg.com/QWDCStage2/images/FactSheet20080903Final.pdf
“Based on the monitoring data and the observed practices at the site, contaminated dust has not migrated into the community. The dust that has been observed in the community is the result of handling clean soil being used to fill excavations and regrade the site.”
Times Ledger, November 11, 2004:
http://www.licbdc.org/area_business_news.html?Year=2004&AID=59
“State Department of Health official Dawn Hettrick said small amounts of benzene were discovered in the odoriferous air. The level was so slight, however, that she said it would take 30 years of exposure to be cancerous and only caused headaches, nausea and difficulty breathing.”
Oh, ok it’s only headaches, nausea, and difficulty breathing I need to worry about now. Thanks Dawn. I can breathe more easily now. And oh yeah, since the remediation has only gone on for 5 years and we have another round starting and going into next year, I am only 20% on my way toward the 30 year exposure.
Yippie!
Walking around last Saturday I smelled a heavy perfume smell in the air on the entire length of Vernon… Am I correct in presuming that I’m smelling air from the remediation site that they’ve added scent to in order to mask a bad (well, worse!) smell?
Smells like fresh laundry?
I feel that safe living in LIC.
If I was as concerned as some of the people posting to this thread apparently are, I would move immediately. I find it amazing that you are complaining on an Internet discussion board about serious health issues, but do not move. Nothing is worth more than your health and money becomes irrelevant in that regard. So, if you are really serious you should not stick around. If you do, I will say that you do not really believe in your own complaints, but simply complain because you have nothing better to do.
Excuse me, #169.
According to you, am I to move rather than defend my home from a demonstrable threat?
What am I–Chief Joseph?
You’re welcome #170.
How can you defend it?
All research and public information available shows that it is safe. They are not going to stop. With that in mind, my point is that if you still really believe that it is unsafe, you would move. However since you stay put, I don’t think you really believe it is as hazardous as you claim.
Send tips, feedback, and death threats to info [at] liqcity [dot] com
Search
Advertisement
Popular Posts
Long Island City fire and ice Monday morning linkageMTA to LIC: 7-train service suspended for the next, um, eleven weekendsLong Island City bleary but warm Monday afternoon linkageRecap of the latest public hearing about LIC's Hunters Point SouthLong Island City Back in the Saddle Friday morning linkageLaughing Devil Comedy Club brews up some funny for Long Island CityliQcity to Long Island City: Beware of SOPA & PIPA!Advertisement
Archives
Arts
They’re baaaaack. Summer Warm Ups at LIC’s PS1 MoMA kick off this Saturday. Long Island City Culture Chronicle: The Queens Art Express Hit List Long Island City’s Ten10 Studios is ‘Growing Up’ this weekendBuzz
Mystery at the Long Island City waterfront Another grocery store for LIC: MetFoods to manifest on 51st Ave Life, death, and transformation in Long Island City. Of storefronts, that is.Community
CRIME: Long Island City woman sexually assaulted on Vernon Blvd Agenda for Long Island City’s next Community Board 2 Meeting, Dec 1st liQcity is going non-profit! Support liQpop and help us help you LIC.Commuting
MTA to LIC: 7-train service suspended for the next, um, eleven weekends Long Island City express to New Jersey? Not any weekend soon. LIC update on the weekend 7 train shutdowns for October 2011Dining
Long Island City’s beloved M.Wells Diner closing down this month Good Eats in LIC: Hunters Point dishes up some serious seasonal seafood Long Island City hosts not-so-new Romanian ‘Ion’s Corner Cafe’Economy
LICBDC news: Borden Ave Bridge back in Sept; LIC boasts low crime rates LICBDC supports local biz with massive Annual Luncheon & Trade Show Long Island City barely hit in the latest Queens foreclosuresEvents
Long Island City events round-up: Fundraiser Fever!! Edible Queens’ ‘Queens Uncorked’ event in LIC to benefit local farmers Long Island City Events: Arts Arts Arts and more ArtsGovernment
liQcity to Long Island City: Beware of SOPA & PIPA! LIC’s dangerous 44th Drive tightening up & getting a bike lane. Thanks DOT! Quickie recount of CB2′s public hearing yesterday on 49th Ave & HP SouthHappenings
Courtyard Winter Carnival at PS1 MoMA with M. Wells & Manducatis Rustica Long Island City Partnership Annual Trade Show & Luncheon 2011 Recap The 2011 ING NYC Marathon blazed through LIC this weekendHealth
Swine Flu visits Long Island City If you smell something, say something. Yoga and Pilates in Long Island City – Radiant Movement StudioLife
Long Island City photos du jour: Hurricane Irene weekend sunset shots Long Island City and Hurricane Irene: A match made in… well, we’ll see. Life in Long Island City as photographed by local residentsLinkage
Long Island City Holiday limbo Tuesday morning linkage Long Island City moon over Monday morning linkage Long Island City drizzly and sunny Tuesday morning linkageliQcity
Long Island City clouds-are-gathering Tuesday morning linkage Quick note from the Editor Add your Long Island City shots to liQcity’s Flickr photo poolLocal Biz
Laughing Devil Comedy Club brews up some funny for Long Island City Support local business! Thank you to our amazing LIC sponsors. Long Island City new local biz update: bistros, burgers and moreNeighborhood
Long Island City’s CB2 tackles Murray Park renovation & film crews in LIC Examining the impact of losing the 2012 Olympic bid on LIC & NYC Public Hearing about new liquor license apps & 48th Ave makeover in LICNew Development
Recap of the latest public hearing about LIC’s Hunters Point South Update and Public Hearing on LIC’s Hunters Point South project An update on Long Island City’s favorite City housing developmentNews
Long Island City bleary but warm Monday afternoon linkage Long Island City Back in the Saddle Friday morning linkage Long Island City fire and ice Monday morning linkageOddities
Accidents will happen in Long Island City. And happen. Long Island City’s long lost East River footbridge concept discovered Breaking LIC news: car drives into Vernon Blvd restaurantOpenings
Long Island City new biz update; many new restaurants popping & bubbling New local business still blooming in Long Island City Retail blooms in Hunters Point; Lots of new Long Island City bizAdvertisement
Links
EAT
BANY Asian Fusion Bella Via Blend Breadbox Café Bricktown Bagels Brooks 1890 Restaurant The Burger Garage Café Henri Court Square Diner The Creek Da Gianni’s Ristorante Dorian Café El Ay Si Five Star Banquet & Restaurant Five Stars Punjabi Diner Gaw Gai Thai Express Ihawan Jackson Avenue Steakhouse Junior’s Café La Vuelta LIC Market Manducatis Manducatis Rustica Manetta’s Masso Riverview Restaurant & Lounge Sage General Store SHI Sushi Siam Testaccio Tournesol Tuk Tuk Waterfront Crabhouse Water’s EdgeDRINK
Butcher Hookah & Juice Bar Communitea Domaine Bar a Vins Dominie’s Hoek Dutch Kills Bar LIC Bar Lounge 47 Penthouse 808 @ Ravel Hotel PJ Leahy’s Shannon Pot Studio Square biergarten SweetleafREAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENTS
5SL - 5th Street Lofts 10 Court Square 10-17 Jackson Ave 10-50 Jackson Ave Condos 41st Ave Condos 44-27 Purves Condo Arris Lofts Avalon Riverview Rentals Avalon Riverview North Rentals Casa Vizcaya Condos Citylights Crescent Club Condos East Coast Rentals East of East East River Tower Echelon Condos Hallets Cove Condos Galaxy Condos Gantry Condos Gotham Center Hunters Point Condos The Foundry LIC Condos Fusion LIC Condos L Haus Condos Murano Condos Orient Condos Packard Square Rentals Piano Factory Condos The Prestige Condos Powerhouse Condos Queens Plaza Condos Solarium Condos Star Tower Condos Ten63 Jackson Condos Vere Condos View59 Condos View at East Coast CondosARTS
5 Pointz AES Gallery Art-O-Mat (RIP) BrickHouse Ceramic Art Center Bridgeview School of Fine Art Center for Holographic Arts Chocolate Factory Theater Climate/Gallery Dean Project Deitch Studios Dorsky Gallery Dutch Kills Gallery Fisher Landau Center for Art Flux Factory Green Space Dance Studio Juvenal Reis Studios LaGuardia Performing Arts Center LIC Artists LIC Art Center LIC Cultural Alliance Live at the Gantries Local Project M55 Gallery Museum of the Moving Image NY Irish Center Noguchi Museum P.S. 1 Queens Art Express Queens Council on the Arts Repetti Gallery SculptureCenter Secret Theatre Silvercup Studios Socrates Sculpture Park Space Womb Thalia Spanish Theatre The Space Texas FirehouseLOCAL BIZ
Big City Graphics & Printing Blue Streak Wines Build it Green! Camp Bow Wow LIC The Cat’s Pajamas Hotel Charge & Ride City Vet C-Town Cranky*s Café Court Square Wines & Spirits Czech-Slovak Varieties Dog Island City Duane Reade E & I Deli Emily Spa Ethereal Boutique Express 1 Laundromat Film Biz Recycling Foodcellar Hunters Point Wines & Spirits Into White Dental Just Things Kika Hair Design Kitty & Dog Lounge Krypton Neon LIC Kids LIC School of Ballet Little Closets Lolly’s Early Learning Center MaidPro Matted LIC Nook n’ Crannie New York Looks Salon Pooches Sport & Spa Primp & Tease Salon Sharifwear Spokesman Cycles State Farm Subdivision Vernon Pharmacy Vernon Wine & Liquor Vine WineHEALTH & FITNESS
Balance Medical Spa City Ice Pavilion CityView Raquet Club CrossFit LIC Element Fitness Into White Dental LIC Physical Therapy LIC YMCA NYC Paintball QueensWest Health Radiant Movement NY Circus Arts Tennisport Triumph Physical Therapy The Yoga Room Yoga Studio 6LOCAL LINKS
108th Police Precinct info Community Board 2 District 37 NYS Assemblywoman Catherine Nolan Dutch Kills Civic Association Edible Queens Magazine Gantry Plaza State Park Greater Astoria Historical Society Green Shores NYC Hunters Point LIC Greenmarket Jimmy Van Bramer, District 26 City Councilman LIC Alliance LIC Boathouse LICBDC LIC Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) LIC Millstones Blog LICweb Materials for the Arts Murray Playground Newtown Creek Alliance Queensbridge Park Queens Public Library: Court Square Branch Queens Public Library: LIC Branch Queens West Development Corporation Partnership for Parks Recycle a Bicycle Skyline City ChurchHOTELS
Best Western Plaza Hotel Comfort Inn Country Inn & Suites by Carlson Days Inn (Sunnyside) Fairfield Inn by Marriott (Sunnyside) Holiday Inn Express Midtown Tunnel (Sunnyside) Holiday Inn Manhattan View Howard Johnson Inn LaQuinta Inn (Sunnyside) Quality Inn Ramada Hotel Ravel Hotel & Rooftop Verve Hotel Z-Hotel (under construction)Advertisement
© 2007 liQcity. All Rights Reserved.
It’s definitely been smelling funky around there. No doubt.