Follow up to the video of dust blowing around at Queenswest, LIC

I heart liqcity.com

Liqcity, can you do anything about getting the Newtown Creek cleaned up?

In case anyone hasn’t gotten it by now, this is why noone goes to any other LIC website other than liqcity these days. Great job guys in getting those idiots to overturn the liquor license ban at Blend and now this.

Liqcity is LIC’s superman.

The developers have nothing to do with it.

13, you mean 11 is a spokesperson for Rockrose.

The DEC has always reacted quickly in the past to any major public complaints about toxic air or dirt. However I think it is sloppy work on their part for not enforcing their rules before they are broken. Most all of the developers on the Queens West parcel tend to dig for as long as possible before starting remediation. I wonder if LIQcity could agitate for constant air monitoring in the LIC area as long as construction is taking place in LIC. But I do have to say good work!!

#16 there is constant air monitioring. you con monitor it online in the link provided on the other thread.

It’s interesting that those who complain the most about anonymous posting, take full advantage of it to bash others.

And #19 what did you do about it?

There are some other tents between the ConEd learning facitily and the Board of Ed building on the waterfront. What is going on there? Is that being preped for development as well?

I still have a bad taste in my mouth over this Joe Conley guy. The Blend incident and his huge flip-flop says a lot about his character. I wrote him several email regarding Blend and he did not respond to one of them.

Good job LIQ, but I continue to view Joe Conley with suspiciously and question his leadership and judgment. With so many important things going on in the area we need real leadership on the issues. This further cements him in my mind as a reactionary figure leaning in whatever direction the wind blows him. We need someone new at the helm.

Hey #26, no one on this thread commented on anonymous postings. I did on the previous thread on this subject. Poster #20′s comment didn’t note that the anonymous comment was on this thread. Therefore, being that I was the only one who commented on anonymous posting, concerning this subject matter, I posted #25 as I did. You are the one making an assumption, not me. I’m not assuming; I’m deducing that the comment was directed at me, because he (poster #20) thinks that I might also be poster #19. With all of the anonymous posting and posting under any pseudonym one wants, it’s hard to know who is who. That was part of the reason for my original comments on anonymous posting , to begin with.

As far as his comment on bashing others, only little minds, somehow seeking thrills, do crap like that.

Did you read the posts on the previous (original) thread on the whole toxic dust/contaminated site problem?

I don’t disguise myself with anonymity or with pseudonyms. It’s obvious that you do. Are you actually poster #19 also? Why are you even commenting on this, when you don’t have all the information necessary, to make an informed comment?

With anonymous posting, as well as with posting under a non-registered pseudonym(s), posters can be as disrespectful, and as moronic as they want to be, without having to own up to what they write. I’m not referring to all anonymous posters, as that is not the purpose of most people. In addition, I think if one leaves the name space blank, that it will post automatically as anonymous.

Lastly, re-read my post (#25). You will see that I am asking, not drawing a hard conclusion. Again, I will use an expression which I often use, concerning those who don’t pay attention, or who believe what they want to believe, before they comment: Listen to what I am saying, not what you think I am saying.

Charlie.

Sorry guys, there has been some issues with the commenting server.