LHaus
Mar 20 2009

Real estate development in Long Island City still has some mojo.

20080317-DSC03141-1

Small rental building on 51st Ave nears completion, Long Island City

While condo construction in Long Island City is tangibly stalled by the economic slowdown, some projects (new and in progress) are still going forward:

A small project on 51st Ave between Vernon Blvd & 5th Street seems to be nearing completion. The original concept indicated apartment rentals with some ground floor retail, which is an interesting arrival for that small block, though there is Lucky Mojo diagonally across the street.

20080317-DSC03142-1

Condo development 10-17 Jackson, at Vernon Blvd, Long Island City

Up the block, at the famed corner of Vernon Blvd & Jackson Ave, the development currently known as 10-17 Jackson Ave continues to get topped off.

Down (up?) Vernon Blvd on 48th Ave, the Solarium, LIC’s first LEED certified Green condo building, is also steadily making progress. Very quickly. Curiously next door, at the Zipper Building, scaffolding has been erected for a month or so, perhaps indicating some forward movement on a condo conversion.

20080317-DSC03143-1

On 48th Ave at Vernon Blvd, Solarium blazes on, Zipper building getting started, Long Island City

37 Comments

Leave Your Comment Comment Feed

that’s some pretty sad looking mojo.

#1 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

The Solarium looks nice though.

#2 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

There are two more that nobody has mentioned and I would love to know more about–because they seem crazy. One on 47rd between vernon and 11th, the other right next to casa vizcaya. Both of them are in tiny lots where a single row house once stood. The one on 47th rd even has a rendering of a condo on it! I do like development in its place, but a skinny little thing stuck in with the row houses is just bad. Not to mention the poor people who live next to these as they are being built.

#3 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

I hope they do not tear down the old zipper factory. What a great old building. Solid as a rock.

#4 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

The zipper building is not solid as a rock. I heard that the core is made of rotting wood. The owner shuold be getting daily fines for keeping the property in disrepair.

#5 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

On 46th Rd there is a potentially historic row of wooden houses. The realtor who bought one claimed to be doing an interior alteration and extension in back. Instead he totally demolished the building and has stuck a 4 story piece of modern stupidity in its place. Despite violation upon violation the City has looked the other way.

#6 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

I see that one all the time #6, what a shame. I could’ve sworn that on one of those houses it has the little copper round seal noting a Queens Historic building, but I may have just been wishing!

There is a huge loop-hole in building codes: If you keep one wall standing, it’s considered an “alteration” instead of “demolition/new construction”

#7 FDNY / 2 years, 10 months ago

Thank you to those who have noted this total lack of aesthetics and good sense by the city and the owner on 46th Rd.
Yes, be sorry for the poor people who live next door, because it is daily outrage. And yes there is a Queensmark plaque from the Queens Historical society on one of the houses. It was awarded to all 3 shingled homes some years ago. And as far as leaving one wall standing-
Forget it they left nothing standing. It should be a total violation. The city will do anything to collect a few more bucks worth of taxes.

#8 IheartFDNY / 2 years, 10 months ago

Yes… it’s a shame to see someone build something with total disregard for the neighboring buildings. Don’t they teach architects to consider the surrounding in architecture 101?

#9 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

how far is this place from dutch kills? i need a drink!

#10 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

I love the pond in your yard.

#11 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

#9–yes, back in the Nineteenth Century, even up until WWI, but then, it sort of fell down…and Architecture 101 shifted from the context of community to one of finance (read globalism). Have a Nice Day.

#12 Townie / 2 years, 10 months ago

10, send me your email address. I want to reach through my computer monitor and rip your goddamn throat out. Then you won’t need that $15 drink ever again.

#13 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

The upside of this economy is that people can’t afford to do this sh*t anymore. Thank goodness.

#14 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

How different are these buildings from all the other crap that has gone up throughout the neighborhood or in other parts of the city in the past decade or longer? Not much. That’s how buildings are constructed now, and that’s how they will continue to be built — regardless of the state of the economy.

#15 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

Historical? The crappy timber-framed and poorly-sided buildings on that 46th rd. block are nothing to write home about. Old, yes. Historical, no. Not everything old is worth saving. It blows my mind that someone posting about “aesthetic judgment” would argue that there’s any value to those old row homes that were the poorly-built-and-hastily-thrown-up-by-developers buildings of their time.

On top of that, this new building is one house down from Casa Vizcaya, so contextually-speaking it’s not really out of place, is it?

#16 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

#16 You are absolutely right. This monstrosity does make Casa Vizcaya look good. And I wish that we could be around to see how some of these thrown together glass and concrete block structures will look in 140 years. Those little charming row houses that were so hastily thrown together, as you put it, have aged pretty well. There is something to be said for maintaining architectural history and most people just don’t seem to get it.

#17 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

Oh please #17, you can’t be serious.

Like another poster pointed out, the ‘developers’ who built those row houses years ago were the ‘developers’ of our time. They threw those up in no time flat and didn’t want, or expect them, to last this long. It’s a miracle they have, but no one will miss them once they’re all gone.

You’re looking at the past through rose-colored glasses. Be in the here and now. live in the present moment.

#18 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

#17 Okay Mr. Developer, no one will miss you when you’re gone either.

#19 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

Wow, you guys at the end here must not be actually looking at that thing on 46rd. I’m in one of the new buildings, so I haven’t been in LIC all that long, but I can I look out on that thing and it is beyone hidous and obtrusive. And it looks like they are even going up another floor. The workmen by the way, slack off all the time so I can only assume it is built like crap, aside from the aesthetics. I agree, the row houses have lasted for a long long time, not to mention they are charming. They are most certainly better built that this crap.

#20 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

Hey #20- I live a block from that building on 46th Rd and walked by it twice yesterday, for example. Making an aesthetic judgment based on what is now a steel beam and concrete block shell is horribly premature. And if you think that the timber frame construction of the buildings around it are “better built,” then please don’t ever consider a career as a building inspector.

Not the mention the INCREDIBLE irony of someone in a waterfront high-rise calling that 4-story building “hideous and intrusive.” Practice what you preach…

#21 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

I’m not in a waterfront high rise so no irony there, but I have watched the construction on this and personally find it appalling. You’re entitled to your opinion.

#22 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

Badge then? Great. So much less irony there.

#23 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

Those vinyl-sided rowhouses are ugly. The nice brick ones with cornices are nice, but the old, plain, vinyl or otherwise houses are just dumpy. I’m glad whenever they are knocked down for a nice, new building – it improves the area.

#24 24 / 2 years, 10 months ago

I guess–if you call a Fedders special a nice new building.

#25 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

I think many of these row houses were done quickly and economically for working class people back in the days. They are not an architectural marvel and people have grown accustomed to seeing them and perceive them as charming. They have also lasted because their owners have maintained them and not because it was built to last an eternity.

What I am trying to say is that what people call today ugly might be considered beautiful, charming or full of character in 100 years. This is because as humans we have trouble letting go of what is familiar. I do agree that some of the new buildings are hideous and no amount of time will make them look better but there are a few buildings of steel and glass that will cherished in 100 years from now.

#26 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

26, I think you’re going to have a very difficult time trying to convince people that brutalist condo towers are somehow charming — now or 100 yearsin the future (if they don’t manage to crumble by then). I’m not defending vinyl sided buildings, but its the human scale of those buildings primarily that people find charming, not necessarily the materials they are made from. It’s the same reason why many people might love an old beaten-up sofa more than some sleek uncomfortable thing from West Elm.

#27 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

#27 I think the Powerhouse is a large building that many people thought had charater, including myself, and that is in no way small or relates to the human scale. Lets bet $100 that I am right and your wrong. I just hope that liqcity.com, you and me are around in 2109 so that I could collect. :)

#28 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

28, I guess you like to lose your money. The hellmouth will open on Vernon Blvd. before a single human anywhere looks at the transmogrified ugliness that is the new Powerhouse and thinks “Charm.” Charm is a Cotswold cottage, a Medieval village in Tuscany, a storefront restaurant in the West Village, and, yes, even a small Depression-era walk-up on a tree-lined street. Charm is not a soulless condo building filled with yuppies. Pick another adjective.

#29 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

#29 you are hung up on the word “Charm” and that is not the only thing that makes a building significant. The Chrysler Building or the Empire State building are not considered “Charming” but they are architecturally significant to NYC. Many people argued that the Twin Towers were architecturally significant. I for one thought that they were bland and did not have any architectural character and I worked there during 9/11.

I also remember saying in my original post that not all buildings will be beloved and a good example would be the awful brick boxes with Fedder sleeves on Jackson Ave. I also referenced the Powerhouse before it was converted.

#30 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

I love those charming vinyl sided homes. I also love Barry Manilow and decorate my apartment with Thomas Kinkade paintings. I drive a Buick and drink Franzia wine from a box. You guys are so snobby on this site.

PS- What does “brutalist” mean?

#31 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

Kudos to the people who have managed to maintain and preserve those small cottage type homes. I have admired those houses ever since I first saw them 16 years ago when I migrated to LIC from Manhattan. I grew up in a small town in PA where we were able to build for the new century without destroying our past history. Those houses have as much right to remain as do the town houses and brownstones in the “Block Beautiful”. Those small houses aren’t by any stretch of the imagination an “architect’s dream house”, but they are a “core” part of the history of Hunters Point.

#32 anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

Well said #32!

#33 anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

I think there are some who will simply never understand why preservation plays an important role. They view the continuity of community as a crappy concept. For them every square inch is ripe for the taking and they must have their monolithic boxes that squeezes as much rental income as possible. That is the goal above and beyond anything else.

There is no better example than 46th Road of how the Zoning has failed and how the DOB is asleep at the wheel. The idea that a hideous building like Vizcaya now becomes the standard for contextual development only makes sense to a moron. The neighborhood is looking more like cold war East Berlin every day.

#34 Anonymous / 2 years, 10 months ago

CHANGE…AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!

#35 Anonymous / 2 years, 9 months ago

whats the deal with the building between the solarium and 5SL. Who owns that and what is going on with it??? Anyone?

#36 Anonymous / 2 years, 3 months ago

Nice blog.. :) Thank you for sharing this informative content :)
I hope to see more content like this. Keep on posting!
Great job! Keep it up! :)

If you have time you can visit this site that i managed to surf in:
Solariums

#37 Nicole Casey / 8 months ago

Leave Your Comment

Some HTML Allowed

Your e-mail will not be shown. Although if you have a Gravatar it will be shown here. Otherwise, anonymous comments are welcome.